This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Correct descriptions of __builtin_bcdadd* and _builtin_bcdsub* functions

From: Kelvin Nilsen <kdnilsen at linux dot ibm dot com>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>
Cc: gcc-patches List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 17:42:48 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Correct descriptions of __builtin_bcdadd* and _builtin_bcdsub* functions
References: <25b9e662-243d-eed1-3b6f-00b1ef9e43a7@linux.ibm.com> <20180802163805.GB13441@gate.crashing.org>

My "consistency" check was against the implementation.

On 8/2/18 11:38 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi Kelvin,
> 
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 02:55:22PM -0500, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
>> Several errors were discovered in the descriptions of the __builtin_bcdadd, __builtin_bcdadd_lt, __builtin_bcdadd_eq,         __builtin_bcdadd_gt, __builtin_bcdadd_ov, __builtin_bcdsub, __builtin_bcdsub_lt, __builtin_bcdsub_eq, __builtin_bcdsub_gt, and __builtin_bcdsub_ov functions.  This patch corrects these documentation errors.
> 
> What did you check this against?  The ABI doc, or what is currently
> implemented?  Neither is very clear to me :-/
> 
> 
> Segher
> 
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Correct descriptions of __builtin_bcdadd* and _builtin_bcdsub* functions
  - From: Segher Boessenkool

References:
- [PATCH, rs6000] Correct descriptions of __builtin_bcdadd* and _builtin_bcdsub* functions
  - From: Kelvin Nilsen
- Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Correct descriptions of __builtin_bcdadd* and _builtin_bcdsub* functions
  - From: Segher Boessenkool

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]