This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] i386: Define __HAVE_INDIRECT_RETURN_ATTRIBUTE__
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 4:56 AM, Jakub Jelinek <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 01:54:46PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 07/19/2018 01:48 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> > Both __has_attribute (indirect_return) and __has_attribute (__indirect_return__)
>> > work here.
>> Applications can have
>> #define indirect_return
>> so the variant without underscore mangling is definitely not correct.
> Incorrect for what? glibc header? Yes. The libsanitizer use, where we
> control the headers and what we define? No.
I am checking my testcases to show how it works.