This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Limit Debug mode impact: overload __niter_base


Here is the updated patch.

    * include/bits/stl_algobase.h (__niter_wrap): New.
    (__copy_move_a2(_II, _II, _OI)): Use latter.
    (__copy_move_backward_a2(_BI1, _BI1, _BI2)): Likewise.
    (fill_n(_OI, _Size, const _Tp&)): Likewise.
    (equal(_II1, _II1, _II2)): Use __glibcxx_requires_can_increment.
    * include/debug/stl_iterator.h
    (std::__niter_base(const __gnu_cxx::_Safe_iterator<
    __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<>, _Sequence>&)): New declaration.
    * include/debug/vector (__niter_base(const __gnu_cxx::_Safe_iterator<
    __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<>, _Sequence>&)): New.

Ok to commit ?


On 02/07/2018 13:57, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 01/07/18 21:20 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
    Here is a new proposal between yours and mine.

    It is still adding a function to wrap what __niter_base unwrap, I called it __nwrap_iter for this reason. But it takes advantage of

Since "niter" refers to __normal_iterator I think a name based on
"niter" would be better than nsomething_iter.

__niter_wrap
__niter_rewrap
__niter_lift (misuse of functional programming term?)
__niter_raise (misuse of linear algebra term?)
__make_niter
__remake_niter


knowing that __niter_base will only unwrap random access iterator to use an expression to that will do the right thing, no matter the original iterator type.

OK, since __niter_base only transforms types based on __normal_iterator that seems safe to assume (in theory we could use
__normal_iterator with non-random access iterators, but we don't).

Could you please add a comment to the __nwrap_iter saying something
like:

 // Reverse the __niter_base transformation to get a
 // __normal_iterator back again (this assumes that __normal_iterator
 // is only used to wrap random access iterators, like pointers).


    I eventually found no issue in the testsuite, despite the std::equal change. I might have had a local invalid test.

Yes, I *did* test it already :-)




diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_algobase.h b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_algobase.h
index d429943..003ae8d 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_algobase.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_algobase.h
@@ -277,6 +277,18 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
    __niter_base(_Iterator __it)
    { return __it; }

+  // Convert an iterator of type _From to an iterator of type _To.
+  // e.g. from int* to __normal_iterator<int*, Seq>.
+  template<typename _Iterator>
+    inline _Iterator
+    __nwrap_iter(_Iterator, _Iterator, _Iterator __res)
+    { return __res; }
+
+  template<typename _From, typename _To>
+    inline _From
+    __nwrap_iter(_From __from, _To __to, _To __res)
+    { return __from + (__res - __to); }

Every time you call this function you pass it:

 __nwrap_iter(x, __niter_base(x), y)

So can the __niter_base(x) call happen inside __nwrap_iter?

i.e.

 template<typename _From, typename _To>
   inline _From
   __nwrap_iter(_From __from, _To __res)
   { return __from + (__res - __niter_base(__from)); }




diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_algobase.h b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_algobase.h
index d429943..e5e7d15 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_algobase.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_algobase.h
@@ -277,6 +277,19 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
     __niter_base(_Iterator __it)
     { return __it; }
 
+  // Reverse the __niter_base transformation to get a
+  // __normal_iterator back again (this assumes that __normal_iterator
+  // is only used to wrap random access iterators, like pointers).
+  template<typename _Iterator>
+    inline _Iterator
+    __niter_wrap(_Iterator, _Iterator __res)
+    { return __res; }
+
+  template<typename _From, typename _To>
+    inline _From
+    __niter_wrap(_From __from, _To __res)
+    { return __from + (__res - __niter_base(__from)); }
+
   // All of these auxiliary structs serve two purposes.  (1) Replace
   // calls to copy with memmove whenever possible.  (Memmove, not memcpy,
   // because the input and output ranges are permitted to overlap.)
@@ -419,9 +432,10 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
     inline _OI
     __copy_move_a2(_II __first, _II __last, _OI __result)
     {
-      return _OI(std::__copy_move_a<_IsMove>(std::__niter_base(__first),
-					     std::__niter_base(__last),
-					     std::__niter_base(__result)));
+      return std::__niter_wrap(__result,
+		std::__copy_move_a<_IsMove>(std::__niter_base(__first),
+					    std::__niter_base(__last),
+					    std::__niter_base(__result)));
     }
 
   /**
@@ -593,7 +607,8 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
     inline _BI2
     __copy_move_backward_a2(_BI1 __first, _BI1 __last, _BI2 __result)
     {
-      return _BI2(std::__copy_move_backward_a<_IsMove>
+      return std::__niter_wrap(__result,
+		std::__copy_move_backward_a<_IsMove>
 		  (std::__niter_base(__first), std::__niter_base(__last),
 		   std::__niter_base(__result)));
     }
@@ -804,7 +819,8 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
       __glibcxx_function_requires(_OutputIteratorConcept<_OI, _Tp>)
       __glibcxx_requires_can_increment(__first, __n);
 
-      return _OI(std::__fill_n_a(std::__niter_base(__first), __n, __value));
+      return std::__niter_wrap(__first,
+		std::__fill_n_a(std::__niter_base(__first), __n, __value));
     }
 
   template<bool _BoolType>
@@ -1062,7 +1078,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_ALGO
       __glibcxx_function_requires(_EqualOpConcept<
 	    typename iterator_traits<_II1>::value_type,
 	    typename iterator_traits<_II2>::value_type>)
-      __glibcxx_requires_valid_range(__first1, __last1);
+      __glibcxx_requires_can_increment_range(__first1, __last1, __first2);
 
       return std::__equal_aux(std::__niter_base(__first1),
 			      std::__niter_base(__last1),
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/stl_iterator.h b/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/stl_iterator.h
index a6a2a76..f20b000 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/stl_iterator.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/stl_iterator.h
@@ -120,4 +120,17 @@ namespace __gnu_debug
 #endif
 }
 
+namespace std
+{
+_GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
+
+  template<typename _Iterator, typename _Container, typename _Sequence>
+    _Iterator
+    __niter_base(const __gnu_debug::_Safe_iterator<
+		 __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<_Iterator, _Container>,
+		 _Sequence>&);
+
+_GLIBCXX_END_NAMESPACE_VERSION
+}
+
 #endif
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/vector b/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/vector
index 802f4fd..ced5520 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/vector
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/vector
@@ -785,6 +785,13 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
       { return std::hash<_GLIBCXX_STD_C::vector<bool, _Alloc>>()(__b); }
     };
 
+ template<typename _Iterator, typename _Container, typename _Sequence>
+    _Iterator
+    __niter_base(const __gnu_debug::_Safe_iterator<
+		 __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<_Iterator, _Container>,
+		 _Sequence>& __it)
+    { return std::__niter_base(__it.base()); }
+
 _GLIBCXX_END_NAMESPACE_VERSION
 #endif
 

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]