This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch, fortran] PR45305 - Array-valued calls to elementals are not simplified
- From: Paul Richard Thomas <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>
- To: jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at charter dot net>
- Cc: "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 16:16:26 +0100
- Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR45305 - Array-valued calls to elementals are not simplified
- References: <CAGkQGiL0eF56n+YWwrkyk0ujXaSe+3u0gHSEMUvunhSRP-BsYw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGkQGiKJSOrjYgQvr=YswvA_xm01BLBXhqkNr+gYfb0vVW7W-w@mail.gmail.com> <db15b547-cb5e-9551-4495-da7fabdeca3f@charter.net>
Ok, thanks.
I think that I will stick to trunk, since we do not seem to have been
overwhelmed with demand to fix this!
Regards
Paul
On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 at 15:37, Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@charter.net> wrote:
>
> On 06/27/2018 06:48 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> > I posted a patch for this on the PR in August 2010. Dominique pointed
> > out that it caused repeated error messages in some testcases; eg.
> > arithmetic_overflow_1.f90
> >
> > As it happens, that seems to have crept in at some time even without
> > the patch for this PR. Nevertheless, I have modified the patch
> > slightly to prevent any more escalation. Apart from this, the patch is
> > very straightforward.
> >
> > Bootstraps and regtests on FC28/x86_64 - OK for trunk and....?
> >
> > Paul
> >
>
> Well this goes way back. OK for trunk. If you want to backport to 7 and
> 8, your choice.
>
> Jerry
--
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
- Albert Einstein