This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] C++: less verbose error-recovery for version conflict markers


OK.

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:57 PM, David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com> wrote:
> We handle version conflict markers in source:
>
> $ cat /tmp/test.cc
>
> extern void f1 (void);
> extern void f2 (void);
> extern void f3 (void);
> extern void f4 (void);
>
> void test ()
> {
>   f1 ();
> <<<<<<< HEAD
>   f2 ();
> =======
>   f3 ();
>>>>>>>> 252be53... Some commit message
>   f4 ();
> }
>
> The C frontend's output is mostly reasonable:
>
> gcc -xc /tmp/test.cc
> /tmp/test.cc: In function ‘test’:
> /tmp/test.cc:9:1: error: version control conflict marker in file
>  <<<<<<< HEAD
>  ^~~~~~~
> /tmp/test.cc:11:1: error: version control conflict marker in file
>  =======
>  ^~~~~~~
> /tmp/test.cc:13:1: error: version control conflict marker in file
>  >>>>>>> 252be53... Some commit message
>  ^~~~~~~
> /tmp/test.cc:13:9: error: invalid suffix "be53..." on integer constant
>  >>>>>>> 252be53... Some commit message
>          ^~~~~~~~~~
>
> whereas in C++ the output can be very verbose:
>
> /tmp/test.cc: In function ‘void test()’:
> /tmp/test.cc:9:1: error: version control conflict marker in file
>  <<<<<<< HEAD
>  ^~~~~~~
> /tmp/test.cc:9:3: error: expected primary-expression before ‘<<’ token
>  <<<<<<< HEAD
>    ^~
> /tmp/test.cc:9:5: error: expected primary-expression before ‘<<’ token
>  <<<<<<< HEAD
>      ^~
> /tmp/test.cc:9:7: error: expected primary-expression before ‘<’ token
>  <<<<<<< HEAD
>        ^
> /tmp/test.cc:9:9: error: ‘HEAD’ was not declared in this scope
>  <<<<<<< HEAD
>          ^~~~
> /tmp/test.cc:11:1: error: version control conflict marker in file
>  =======
>  ^~~~~~~
> /tmp/test.cc:11:3: error: expected primary-expression before ‘==’ token
>  =======
>    ^~
> /tmp/test.cc:11:5: error: expected primary-expression before ‘==’ token
>  =======
>      ^~
> /tmp/test.cc:11:7: error: expected primary-expression before ‘=’ token
>  =======
>        ^
> /tmp/test.cc:13:1: error: version control conflict marker in file
>  >>>>>>> 252be53... Some commit message
>  ^~~~~~~
> /tmp/test.cc:13:3: error: expected primary-expression before ‘>>’ token
>  >>>>>>> 252be53... Some commit message
>    ^~
> /tmp/test.cc:13:5: error: expected primary-expression before ‘>>’ token
>  >>>>>>> 252be53... Some commit message
>      ^~
> /tmp/test.cc:13:7: error: expected primary-expression before ‘>’ token
>  >>>>>>> 252be53... Some commit message
>        ^
> /tmp/test.cc:13:9: error: unable to find numeric literal operator ‘operator""be53...’
>  >>>>>>> 252be53... Some commit message
>          ^~~~~~~~~~
>
> The following patch eliminates this spew by consuming tokens until the
> start of the next line after emitting such a message.
>
> The C frontend and C++ with -std=c++98 both emit:
>   error: invalid suffix "be53..." on integer constant
> on the above testcase, but it's not fixable through this approach,
> since that error is emitted by the lexer.
>
>
> Successfully bootstrapped & regrtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
>
> OK for trunk?
>
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>         * parser.c (cp_parser_error_1): After issuing a conflict marker
>         error, consume tokens until the end of the source line.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>         * g++.dg/conflict-markers-2.C: New test.
> ---
>  gcc/cp/parser.c                           | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/conflict-markers-2.C | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/conflict-markers-2.C
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c
> index 154729c..09d224f 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/parser.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c
> @@ -2862,6 +2862,20 @@ cp_parser_error_1 (cp_parser* parser, const char* gmsgid,
>        if (cp_lexer_peek_conflict_marker (parser->lexer, token->type, &loc))
>         {
>           error_at (loc, "version control conflict marker in file");
> +         expanded_location token_exploc = expand_location (token->location);
> +         /* Consume tokens until the end of the source line.  */
> +         while (1)
> +           {
> +             cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
> +             cp_token *next = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer);
> +             if (next == NULL)
> +               break;
> +             expanded_location next_exploc = expand_location (next->location);
> +             if (next_exploc.file != token_exploc.file)
> +               break;
> +             if (next_exploc.line != token_exploc.line)
> +               break;
> +           }
>           return;
>         }
>      }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/conflict-markers-2.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/conflict-markers-2.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..4fc3820
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/conflict-markers-2.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> +
> +extern void f1 (void);
> +extern void f2 (void);
> +extern void f3 (void);
> +extern void f4 (void);
> +
> +void test ()
> +{
> +  f1 ();
> +<<<<<<< HEAD // { dg-error "conflict marker" }
> +  f2 ();
> +======= // { dg-error "conflict marker" }
> +  f3 ();
> +>>>>>>> 252be53... Some commit message // { dg-error "conflict marker" }
> +  f4 ();
> +}
> --
> 1.8.5.3
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]