This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[PATCH] gracefully deal with invalid strlen declarations (PR 86114)
- From: Martin Sebor <msebor at gmail dot com>
- To: Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 15:29:03 -0600
- Subject: [PATCH] gracefully deal with invalid strlen declarations (PR 86114)
Declaring strlen() to return a pointer instead of size_t
and then calling the function can result in an ICE due to
both gimple-fold and tree-ssa-strlen assuming the function
necessarily returns an integer.
As luck would have it, the incompatible declaration isn't
detected by -Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch (bug 86125), nor
apparently even by gimple_builtin_call_types_compatible_p(),
and so the invalid declaration makes its way where it isn't
expected.
The attached patch avoids the ICE by removing the unsafe
assumption from both the folder and the strlen pass.
Martin
PR tree-optimization/86114 - ICE in gimple_fold_builtin_strlen with an invalid call to strnlen
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR tree-optimization/86114
* gcc.dg/pr86114.c: New test.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR tree-optimization/86114
* gimple-fold.c (gimple_fold_builtin_strlen): Only handle LHS
of integer types.
* tree-ssa-strlen.c (maybe_set_strlen_range): Same.
Index: gcc/gimple-fold.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/gimple-fold.c (revision 261516)
+++ gcc/gimple-fold.c (working copy)
@@ -3538,9 +3538,10 @@ gimple_fold_builtin_strlen (gimple_stmt_iterator *
return true;
}
- tree lhs = gimple_call_lhs (stmt);
- if (lhs && TREE_CODE (lhs) == SSA_NAME)
- set_range_info (lhs, VR_RANGE, minlen, maxlen);
+ if (tree lhs = gimple_call_lhs (stmt))
+ if (TREE_CODE (lhs) == SSA_NAME
+ && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (lhs)))
+ set_range_info (lhs, VR_RANGE, minlen, maxlen);
return false;
}
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c (revision 261518)
+++ gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c (working copy)
@@ -1124,14 +1124,15 @@ adjust_last_stmt (strinfo *si, gimple *stmt, bool
update_stmt (last.stmt);
}
-/* For an LHS that is an SSA_NAME and for strlen() argument SRC, set
- LHS range info to [0, N] if SRC refers to a character array A[N]
- with unknown length bounded by N. */
+/* For an LHS that is an SSA_NAME with integer type and for strlen()
+ argument SRC, set LHS range info to [0, N] if SRC refers to
+ a character array A[N] with unknown length bounded by N. */
static void
maybe_set_strlen_range (tree lhs, tree src)
{
- if (TREE_CODE (lhs) != SSA_NAME)
+ if (TREE_CODE (lhs) != SSA_NAME
+ || !INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (lhs)))
return;
if (TREE_CODE (src) == SSA_NAME)
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr86114.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr86114.c (nonexistent)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr86114.c (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/86114 - ICE in gimple_fold_builtin_strlen with
+ an invalid call to strnlen
+ { dg-do compile }
+ { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
+
+extern char* strcmp (const char*, const char*);
+extern char* strncmp (const char*, const char*, size_t);
+extern char* strlen (const char*);
+extern char* strnlen (const char*, size_t);
+extern char* strcspn (const char*, const char*);
+extern char* strspn (const char*, const char*);
+extern char* strxfrm (const char*, const char*, size_t);
+
+char** q;
+
+void test_array (const char *s)
+{
+ extern char a[8];
+
+ q[0] = strcmp (a, s);
+ q[1] = strncmp (a, s, 7);
+ q[2] = strlen (a);
+ q[3] = strnlen (a, 7);
+ q[4] = strcspn (a, s);
+ q[5] = strspn (a, s);
+ q[6] = strxfrm (a, s, 7);
+}
+
+void test_pointer (const char *s, const char *t)
+{
+ q[0] = strcmp (s, t);
+ q[1] = strncmp (s, t, 7);
+ q[2] = strlen (s);
+ q[3] = strnlen (s, 7);
+ q[4] = strcspn (s, t);
+ q[5] = strspn (s, t);
+ q[6] = strxfrm (s, s, 7);
+}
+
+/* { dg-prune-output "-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch" } */