This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [ARM/FDPIC 08/21] [ARM] FDPIC: Fix corner case of weak symbol


Hi Christophe,

On 25/05/18 09:03, Christophe Lyon wrote:
When checking the address of a weak symbol in an executable, it is
mandatory to use the GOTFUNCDESC scheme so that the address==NULL
semantic is valid if the symbol is not present in the final link.

2018-XX-XX  Christophe Lyon  <christophe.lyon@st.com>
        Mickaël Guêné <mickael.guene@st.com>

        gcc/
        * config/arm/arm.c (arm_local_funcdesc_p): New function.
        (legitimize_pic_address): Handle weak symbols in FDPIC mode.
        (arm_assemble_integer): Likewise.

Change-Id: I3fa0b63bc0f672903f405aa72cc46052de1c0feb

diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
index bbf8884..025485d 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
@@ -3771,6 +3771,46 @@ arm_options_perform_arch_sanity_checks (void)
     }
 }

+/* Test whether a local function descriptor is canonical, i.e.,
+   whether we can use GOTOFFFUNCDESC to compute the address of the
+   function.  */
+static bool
+arm_local_funcdesc_p (rtx fnx)
+{
+  tree fn;
+  enum symbol_visibility vis;
+  bool ret;
+
+  if (!TARGET_FDPIC)
+    return TRUE;
+
+  if (! SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P (fnx))
+    return FALSE;
+
+  fn = SYMBOL_REF_DECL (fnx);
+
+  if (! fn)
+    return FALSE;
+
+  /* Local function declared as weak must use GOTFUNCDESC so their
+     FUNCDESC is NULL if they are not linked in.  */
+  if (DECL_WEAK(fn))
+    return FALSE;
+
+  vis = DECL_VISIBILITY (fn);
+
+  if (vis == VISIBILITY_PROTECTED)
+    /* Private function descriptors for protected functions are not
+       canonical.  Temporarily change the visibility to global.  */
+    vis = VISIBILITY_DEFAULT;
+
+  ret = default_binds_local_p_1 (fn, flag_pic);
+
+  DECL_VISIBILITY (fn) = vis;
+

I'm a bit suspicious of the above few lines. Does this function end up changing the visibility
of 'fn'? If so, this function is not a pure predicate function and should be documented that it
modifies some part of its argument. Or did you mean to change the visibility before the call to
default_binds_local_p_1 and restore it afterwards?

Thanks,
Kyrill

+  return ret;
+}
+
 static void
 arm_add_gc_roots (void)
 {
@@ -7488,7 +7528,9 @@ legitimize_pic_address (rtx orig, machine_mode mode, rtx reg)
            || (GET_CODE (orig) == SYMBOL_REF
                && SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P (orig)
                && (SYMBOL_REF_DECL (orig)
-                  ? !DECL_WEAK (SYMBOL_REF_DECL (orig)) : 1)))
+                  ? !DECL_WEAK (SYMBOL_REF_DECL (orig)) : 1)
+              && (!SYMBOL_REF_FUNCTION_P(orig)
+                  || arm_local_funcdesc_p (orig))))
           && NEED_GOT_RELOC
           && arm_pic_data_is_text_relative)
         insn = arm_pic_static_addr (orig, reg);
@@ -23072,7 +23114,9 @@ arm_assemble_integer (rtx x, unsigned int size, int aligned_p)
               || (GET_CODE (x) == SYMBOL_REF
                   && (!SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P (x)
                       || (SYMBOL_REF_DECL (x)
-                         ? DECL_WEAK (SYMBOL_REF_DECL (x)) : 0))))
+                         ? DECL_WEAK (SYMBOL_REF_DECL (x)) : 0)
+                     || (SYMBOL_REF_FUNCTION_P (x)
+                         && !arm_local_funcdesc_p (x)))))
             {
               if (TARGET_FDPIC && SYMBOL_REF_FUNCTION_P (x))
                 fputs ("(GOTFUNCDESC)", asm_out_file);
--
2.6.3



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]