This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Fix PR83789: __builtin_altivec_lvx fails for powerpc for altivec-4.c


On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 09:10:38PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 3/21/18 7:37 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:47:41PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> >> I'll note that GCC 7 does not need any of the changes to rs6000-p8swap.c,
> >> since that file doesn't exist and doesn't need to exist in GCC 7, so I've
> >> left those changes out.
> > 
> > Did that same code live in rs6000.c in GCC 7, or is it new since
> > rs6000-p8swap.c was split off from there?  And what about GCC 6?
> 
> The trunk patch's changes to rs6000-p8swap.c were to rs6000_gen_lvx and
> rs6000_gen_stvx and those are new to GCC 8.  They are used as part of
> Kelvin's optimization that changes the little endian unfriendly vsx
> loads and stores that require swaps, with the altivec lvx/stvx which
> do not need swaps.  That optimization was new to GCC 8, so there was
> no need for the rs6000-p8swap.c changes.

Thanks for looking.

> If you're asking about whether we also need to backport to GCC 6, I
> believe Kaushik said in the bugzilla that he only encountered the
> ICE on GCC 7 and trunk, so I don't think we need a GCC 6 backport.

Uh yes, that is what I meant.  Okay, since we have no way to check if
it fixes anything, let's not backport it to 6.


Segher


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]