This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PR c++/71251] out-of-range parms in tmpl arg substitution


On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:29 PM, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2018, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>> +  if (id == error_mark_node)
>>> +    return error_mark_node;
>
>> Why wait until here to return?  There are error returns immediately
>> above and below your first hunk.
>
> QOI.  Returning immediately, we then get other errors.  We could consume
> tokens till the end of the declaration, but I figured we might as well
> try to parse them and see whether there were any other legitimate errors
> to report.

It just seems a bit odd to have the check and the return so far apart.
Do they need to be separate at all?
I think we definitely want to move the check down below the
cp_parser_commit_to_tentative_parse.

Jason


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]