This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++ PATCH to tweak cp_fully_fold (PR c++/84590)
- From: Marek Polacek <polacek at redhat dot com>
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 22:38:36 +0100
- Subject: Re: C++ PATCH to tweak cp_fully_fold (PR c++/84590)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20180301191204.GE16833@redhat.com> <CADzB+2=0bU0iRb8+O5Jehvjp72-S_ghGNUnywPV1FWkU3JnYHQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:29:47PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> I think this should happen in the block with maybe_constant_value;
> cp_fold_rvalue doesn't do this.
This, then:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
2018-03-01 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
PR c++/84590
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_fully_fold): Unwrap TARGET_EXPR or a CONSTRUCTOR
wrapped in VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR.
* c-c++-common/ubsan/shift-11.c: New test.
diff --git gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c
index 55a9d278dbe..0ddd435454c 100644
--- gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c
+++ gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c
@@ -2037,7 +2037,17 @@ cp_fully_fold (tree x)
/* FIXME cp_fold ought to be a superset of maybe_constant_value so we don't
have to call both. */
if (cxx_dialect >= cxx11)
- x = maybe_constant_value (x);
+ {
+ x = maybe_constant_value (x);
+ /* Sometimes we are given a CONSTRUCTOR but the call above wraps it into
+ a TARGET_EXPR; undo that here. */
+ if (TREE_CODE (x) == TARGET_EXPR)
+ x = TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL (x);
+ else if (TREE_CODE (x) == VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR
+ && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (x, 0)) == CONSTRUCTOR
+ && TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (x, 0)) == TREE_TYPE (x))
+ x = TREE_OPERAND (x, 0);
+ }
return cp_fold_rvalue (x);
}
diff --git gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/ubsan/shift-11.c gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/ubsan/shift-11.c
index e69de29bb2d..03a72e217a2 100644
--- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/ubsan/shift-11.c
+++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/ubsan/shift-11.c
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* PR c++/84590 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-fsanitize=shift" } */
+
+struct S {
+ int b;
+};
+
+void
+fn (void)
+{
+ struct S c1 = { 1 << -1 }; /* { dg-warning "left shift" } */
+}
Marek