This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix profile_quality sanity check.


On 01/19/2018 02:21 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> How about keeping profile_uninitialized at the zero value location and asserting m_quality != profile_uninitialized ?
> 
> Thanks,
> - Tom

Yes, that would be possible.

Can you please test that the patch does not generate warnings?

I'm running regression tests.

Martin
>From e1159c2404947f675200efc4476e7e0994b81101 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marxin <mliska@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:27:40 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix profile_quality sanity check.

gcc/ChangeLog:

2018-01-18  Martin Liska  <mliska@suse.cz>

	* profile-count.h (enum profile_quality): Add
	profile_uninitialized as the first value. Do not number values
	as they are zero based.
	(profile_count::verify): Update sanity check.
	(profile_probability::verify): Likewise.
---
 gcc/profile-count.h | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/profile-count.h b/gcc/profile-count.h
index 7a43917ebbc..828d6d0ee4b 100644
--- a/gcc/profile-count.h
+++ b/gcc/profile-count.h
@@ -26,34 +26,36 @@ struct function;
 /* Quality of the profile count.  Because gengtype does not support enums
    inside of classes, this is in global namespace.  */
 enum profile_quality {
+  /* Uninitialized value.  */
+  profile_uninitialized,
   /* Profile is based on static branch prediction heuristics and may
      or may not match reality.  It is local to function and can not be compared
      inter-procedurally.  Never used by probabilities (they are always local).
    */
-  profile_guessed_local = 1,
+  profile_guessed_local,
   /* Profile was read by feedback and was 0, we used local heuristics to guess
      better.  This is the case of functions not run in profile fedback.
      Never used by probabilities.  */
-  profile_guessed_global0 = 2,
+  profile_guessed_global0,
 
   /* Same as profile_guessed_global0 but global count is adjusted 0.  */
-  profile_guessed_global0adjusted = 3,
+  profile_guessed_global0adjusted,
 
   /* Profile is based on static branch prediction heuristics.  It may or may
      not reflect the reality but it can be compared interprocedurally
      (for example, we inlined function w/o profile feedback into function
       with feedback and propagated from that).
      Never used by probablities.  */
-  profile_guessed = 4,
+  profile_guessed,
   /* Profile was determined by autofdo.  */
-  profile_afdo = 5,
+  profile_afdo,
   /* Profile was originally based on feedback but it was adjusted
      by code duplicating optimization.  It may not precisely reflect the
      particular code path.  */
-  profile_adjusted = 6,
+  profile_adjusted,
   /* Profile was read from profile feedback or determined by accurate static
      method.  */
-  profile_precise = 7
+  profile_precise
 };
 
 /* The base value for branch probability notes and edge probabilities.  */
@@ -505,8 +507,7 @@ public:
   /* Return false if profile_probability is bogus.  */
   bool verify () const
     {
-      gcc_checking_assert (profile_guessed_local <= m_quality
-			   && m_quality <= profile_precise);
+      gcc_checking_assert (m_quality != profile_uninitialized);
       if (m_val == uninitialized_probability)
 	return m_quality == profile_guessed;
       else if (m_quality < profile_guessed)
@@ -786,8 +787,7 @@ public:
   /* Return false if profile_count is bogus.  */
   bool verify () const
     {
-      gcc_checking_assert (profile_guessed_local <= m_quality
-			   && m_quality <= profile_precise);
+      gcc_checking_assert (m_quality != profile_uninitialized);
       return m_val != uninitialized_count || m_quality == profile_guessed_local;
     }
 
-- 
2.14.3


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]