This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[PATCH] Fix 2 typos
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 17:20:08 +0100
- Subject: [PATCH] Fix 2 typos
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Hi!
There is no get_base_ref_and_offset function and AFAIK never has been,
my guess is these comments meant get_ref_base_and_extent.
Ok for trunk?
2017-12-08 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
* ipa-polymorphic-call.c (noncall_stmt_may_be_vtbl_ptr_store): Fix
a comment typo, get_base_ref_and_offset -> get_ref_base_and_extent.
* ipa-prop.c (stmt_may_be_vtbl_ptr_store): Likewise.
--- gcc/ipa-polymorphic-call.c.jj 2017-10-10 22:04:02.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/ipa-polymorphic-call.c 2017-12-08 15:49:00.883187008 +0100
@@ -1149,7 +1149,7 @@ noncall_stmt_may_be_vtbl_ptr_store (gimp
if (TREE_CODE (lhs) == COMPONENT_REF
&& !DECL_VIRTUAL_P (TREE_OPERAND (lhs, 1)))
return false;
- /* In the future we might want to use get_base_ref_and_offset to find
+ /* In the future we might want to use get_ref_base_and_extent to find
if there is a field corresponding to the offset and if so, proceed
almost like if it was a component ref. */
}
--- gcc/ipa-prop.c.jj 2017-11-28 22:19:30.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/ipa-prop.c 2017-12-08 15:48:43.848397515 +0100
@@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ stmt_may_be_vtbl_ptr_store (gimple *stmt
if (TREE_CODE (lhs) == COMPONENT_REF
&& !DECL_VIRTUAL_P (TREE_OPERAND (lhs, 1)))
return false;
- /* In the future we might want to use get_base_ref_and_offset to find
+ /* In the future we might want to use get_ref_base_and_extent to find
if there is a field corresponding to the offset and if so, proceed
almost like if it was a component ref. */
}
Jakub