This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi, On 01/12/2017 16:43, Jeff Law wrote:
Excellent, thanks Jeff. Thus, barring strong contrary opinions, I'll take care of that over the we.On 12/01/2017 03:28 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:Hi, On 16/11/2017 16:33, Koval, Julia wrote:// I failed to send patch itself, it is too big even in gzipped form. What is the right way to send such big patches? Hi, this patch removes cilkplus. Ok for trunk?Now that cilkplus is gone I suppose we should clean-up Bugzilla about that. Shall I go ahead and essentially close all the bugs we got? As WONTFIX or what else? Let's agree on something. In principle we could keep the regressions for the sake of the existing release branches but I think we got very, very, few of those and anyway I don't see who gonna work on that...Not sure if we have a policy in this space or not. If we don't then my vote would be for CLOSE/WONTFIX now. That seems to most accurately reflect state -- we're not going to be fixing any Cilk+ stuff on the trunk or in the release branches.
Cheers, Paolo.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |