This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Replying to an older patch ([PATCH] Fix failing test-case)
- From: Sudakshina Das <sudi dot das at arm dot com>
- To: mliska at suse dot cz, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Cc: nd <nd at arm dot com>, hubicka at ucw dot cz, Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo dot tkachov at foss dot arm dot com>, Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>, Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana dot Radhakrishnan at arm dot com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:10:47 +0000
- Subject: Re: Replying to an older patch ([PATCH] Fix failing test-case)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Sudi dot Das at arm dot com;
- Nodisclaimer: True
- References: <a45b078e-0d23-aeec-17bb-e2fdf1dd2c92@arm.com>
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
On 30/11/17 11:03, Sudakshina Das wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg01157.html
This patch fixed a test case switch-case-2.c. I am seeing
switch-case-1.c failing on
arm-none-linux-gnueabihf:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/switch-case-1.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand ";;
basic block[^\\n]*count 2000" 1 (found 0 times)
aarch64-none-linux-gnu:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/switch-case-1.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand ";;
basic block[^\\n]*count 2000" 1 (found 2 times)
which looks pretty similar (also the same changes make it pass). Can you
confirm?
Sudi
Put wrong email address earlier. And adding more people on cc