This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 80955 (Macros expanded in definition of user-defined literals)


On 10/25/2017 6:44 PM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:
On 10/25/2017 4:20 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 10/25/2017 12:03 AM, Mukesh Kapoor wrote:

Thanks for pointing this out. Checking in the front end will be difficult because the front end gets tokens after macro expansion. I think the difficulty of fixing this bug comes because of the requirement to maintain backward compatibility with the option -Wliteral-suffix for -std=c++11.

IIUC the warning's intent is to catch cases of:
printf ("some format"PRIx64 ..., ...);
where there's no space between the string literals and the PRIx64 macro.  I suspect it's very common for there to be a following string-literal, so perhaps the preprocessor could detect:

<string-literal>NON-FN-MACRO<maybe-space><string-literal>

and warn on that sequence?

Yes, this can be done easily and this is also the usage mentioned in the man page. I made this change in the compiler, bootstrapped it and ran the tests. The following two tests fail after the fix:

g++.dg/cpp0x/Wliteral-suffix.C
g++.dg/cpp0x/warn_cxx0x4.C

Both tests have code similar to the following (from Wliteral-suffix.C):

#define BAR "bar"
#define PLUS_ONE + 1

  char c = '3'PLUS_ONE;   // { dg-warning "invalid suffix on literal" }
  char s[] = "foo"BAR;    // { dg-warning "invalid suffix on literal" }

Other compilers don't accept this code. Maybe I should just modify these tests to have error messages instead of warnings and submit my revised fix?

Actually, according to the man page for -Wliteral-suffix, only macro names that don't start with an underscore should be considered when issuing a warning:

       -Wliteral-suffix (C++ and Objective-C++ only)
           Warn when a string or character literal is followed by a ud-suffix
           which does not begin with an underscore...

So the fix is simply to check if the macro name in is_macro() starts with an underscore. The function is_macro() is called only at three places. At two places it's used to check for the warning related to -Wliteral-suffix and the check for underscore should be made for these two cases; at one place it is used to check for the warning related to -Wc++11-compat and there is no need to check for underscore for this case.

The fix is simply to pass a bool flag as an additional argument to is_macro() to decide whether the macro name starts with an underscore or not. I have tested the attached patch on x86_64-linux. Thanks.

Mukesh

Attachment: CL_80955
Description: Text document

Attachment: patch_80955
Description: Text document


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]