This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix REG_EQUAL note in x86 -m8bit-idiv code


On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> While working on the following patch, I've discovered that the REG_EQUAL
> notes for DImode signed/unsigned division/modulo are wrong, there is
> e.g. (div:SI (reg:DI ...) (reg:DI ...)).
>
> Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for
> trunk?
>
> 2017-09-29  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
>
>         * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_split_idivmod): Use mode instead of
>         always SImode for DIV and MOD in REG_EQUAL notes.

OK for mainline and release branches.

Thanks,
Uros.

> --- gcc/config/i386/i386.c.jj   2017-09-28 20:35:14.000000000 +0200
> +++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c      2017-09-29 19:15:27.822267844 +0200
> @@ -21980,13 +21980,13 @@ ix86_split_idivmod (machine_mode mode, r
>
>    if (signed_p)
>      {
> -      div = gen_rtx_DIV (SImode, operands[2], operands[3]);
> -      mod = gen_rtx_MOD (SImode, operands[2], operands[3]);
> +      div = gen_rtx_DIV (mode, operands[2], operands[3]);
> +      mod = gen_rtx_MOD (mode, operands[2], operands[3]);
>      }
>    else
>      {
> -      div = gen_rtx_UDIV (SImode, operands[2], operands[3]);
> -      mod = gen_rtx_UMOD (SImode, operands[2], operands[3]);
> +      div = gen_rtx_UDIV (mode, operands[2], operands[3]);
> +      mod = gen_rtx_UMOD (mode, operands[2], operands[3]);
>      }
>
>    /* Extract remainder from AH.  */
>
>         Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]