This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: [PATCH][x86] Knights Mill -march/-mtune options


> -----Original Message-----
> From: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Uros Bizjak
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 12:23 PM
> To: Peryt, Sebastian <sebastian.peryt@intel.com>
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yukhin@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][x86] Knights Mill -march/-mtune options
> 
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Peryt, Sebastian
> <sebastian.peryt@intel.com> wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> >> owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Uros Bizjak
> >> Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2017 6:14 PM
> >> To: Peryt, Sebastian <sebastian.peryt@intel.com>
> >> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yukhin@gmail.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH][x86] Knights Mill -march/-mtune options
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Peryt, Sebastian
> >> <sebastian.peryt@intel.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > This patch adds  options -march=/-mtune=knm for Knights Mill.
> >> >
> >> > 2017-09-14  Sebastian Peryt  <sebastian.peryt@intel.com> gcc/
> >> >
> >> >         * config.gcc: Support "knm".
> >> >         * config/i386/driver-i386.c (host_detect_local_cpu): Detect "knm".
> >> >         * config/i386/i386-c.c (ix86_target_macros_internal): Handle
> >> >         PROCESSOR_KNM.
> >> >         * config/i386/i386.c (m_KNM): Define.
> >> >         (processor_target_table): Add "knm".
> >> >         (PTA_KNM): Define.
> >> >         (ix86_option_override_internal): Add "knm".
> >> >         (ix86_issue_rate): Add PROCESSOR_KNM.
> >> >         (ix86_adjust_cost): Ditto.
> >> >         (ia32_multipass_dfa_lookahead): Ditto.
> >> >         (get_builtin_code_for_version): Handle PROCESSOR_KNM.
> >> >         (fold_builtin_cpu): Define M_INTEL_KNM.
> >> >         * config/i386/i386.h (TARGET_KNM): Define.
> >> >         (processor_type): Add PROCESSOR_KNM.
> >> >         * config/i386/x86-tune.def: Add m_KNM.
> >> >         * doc/invoke.texi: Add knm as x86 -march=/-mtune= CPU type.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >     gcc/testsuite/
> >> >
> >> >         * gcc.target/i386/funcspec-5.c: Test knm.
> >> >
> >> > Is it ok for trunk?
> >>
> >> You also have to update libgcc/cpuinfo.h together with
> >> fold_builtin_cpu from i386.c. Please note that all new processor
> >> types and subtypes have to be added at the end of the enum.
> >>
> >
> > Uros,
> >
> > I have updated libgcc/cpuinfo.h and libgcc/cpuinfo.c. I understood
> > that CPU_TYPE_MAX in libgcc/cpuinfo.h processor_types is some kind of
> > barrier, this is why I put KNM before that. Is that correct thinking?
> > As for fold_builtin_cpu in i386.c I already have something like this:
> >
> > @@ -34217,6 +34229,7 @@ fold_builtin_cpu (tree fndecl, tree *args)
> >      M_AMDFAM15H,
> >      M_INTEL_SILVERMONT,
> >      M_INTEL_KNL,
> > +    M_INTEL_KNM,
> >      M_AMD_BTVER1,
> >      M_AMD_BTVER2,
> >      M_CPU_SUBTYPE_START,
> > @@ -34262,6 +34275,7 @@ fold_builtin_cpu (tree fndecl, tree *args)
> >        {"bonnell", M_INTEL_BONNELL},
> >        {"silvermont", M_INTEL_SILVERMONT},
> >        {"knl", M_INTEL_KNL},
> > +      {"knm", M_INTEL_KNM},
> >        {"amdfam10h", M_AMDFAM10H},
> >        {"barcelona", M_AMDFAM10H_BARCELONA},
> >        {"shanghai", M_AMDFAM10H_SHANGHAI},
> >
> > I couldn't find any other place where I'm supposed to add anything extra.
> 
> Please look at libgcc/config/i386/cpuinfo.h. The comment here says that:
> 
> /* Any new types or subtypes have to be inserted at the end. */
> 
> The above patch should then add M_INTEL_KNM as the last entry *before*
> M_CPU_SUBTYPE_START.
> 

Sorry, I didn't notice this value at first. I believe now it's correct.

Sebastian

> > Additionally I updated one extra test I found -
> > gcc.target/i386/funcspec-56.inc
> >
> >> Ops, and ANDFAM17H processor type should not be there in cpuinfo.h.
> >
> > Sorry, I don't understand - it shouldn't be at this position, or in this enum at all?
> 
> This means I have to synchronize gcc part with libgcc. I'll do it later today.
> 
> Uros.

Attachment: KNM_enabling_v3.patch
Description: KNM_enabling_v3.patch


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]