This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Introduce configure flag --with-stage1-cflags.


On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/31/2017 01:47 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> I would like to ping this. Input from other people will be appreciated ;)
> I think the thing to keep in mind here is that IIUC this only affects
> things when we've configured using the --with-stage1-cflags option.
>
> So questions about is -O1 more stable than -O2, should we restrict -O2
> to newer compilers, etc are really more about the defaults we set.
>
> My understanding is the patch is just adding the capability and does not
> change the default.  Assuming that's the case, then I'm comfortable
> acking the raw infrastructure.

OTOH you can simply set STAGE1_CFLAGS so the value of this
as a configure option is somewhat questionable.

> jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]