This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, gcc-7-branch] Backport PR80038


On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Xi Ruoyao <ryxi@stu.xidian.edu.cn> wrote:
> On 2017-08-21 23:37 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
>> On 2017-04-25 09:30 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> > On 04/14/2017 06:44 PM, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
>> > > On 2017-04-14 15:00 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
>> > > > On 2017-04-13 09:05 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Did you verify LTO bootstrap still works with the patch?
>> > > >
>> > > > I've just done a LTO bootstrapp (boarding a train :) ).
>> > > > It works with my patch.
>> > >
>> > > I've done dejagnu tests in lto.exp and built a Linux kernel
>> > > with lto bootstrapped GCC.   They seem good.
>> >
>> > Given Richi's general agreement around the in_lto_p, let's go with the
>> > patch on the trunk only.
>> >
>> > If you get positive feedback from Jan, then this can be backported to
>> > gcc-7 after it's been on the trunk for at least a week.
>>
>> We have 15 weeks now :)
>>
>> Re-tested on gcc-7-branch with lto-bootstrap.  No regressions.  Is it
>> OK to backport this to gcc-7-branch?
>
> I was too stupid so I didn't attach the patch :(
>
> It's attached here.

Ok for the gcc 7 branch.

Thanks,
Richard.

> --
> Xi Ruoyao <ryxi@stu.xidian.edu.cn>
> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]