This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Support std::is_aggregate on clang++ (was [cfe-dev] clang++: std::is_aggregate unusable with clang-5.0/libstdc++-7)

From: Tim Song <t dot canens dot cpp at gmail dot com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>
Cc: Katsuhiko Nishimra <ktns dot 87 at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, cfe-dev at lists dot llvm dot org
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:23:03 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Support std::is_aggregate on clang++ (was [cfe-dev] clang++: std::is_aggregate unusable with clang-5.0/libstdc++-7)
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <20170727072715.43fqiep4nawwvzlc@netzach.ktns.kdns.info> <20170731145342.GW15340@redhat.com> <CAPQZVxuetVo6jnhBRZ37eW3yMrosMjyXHWMjTH6XdWaRC51Q9w@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Tim Song <t.canens.cpp@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> https://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#checks-for-type-trait-primitives
> seems to suggest using __has_extension instead.

Hmm, that doesn't work. Oh well.

References:
- [PATCH] libstdc++: Support std::is_aggregate on clang++ (was [cfe-dev] clang++: std::is_aggregate unusable with clang-5.0/libstdc++-7)
  - From: Katsuhiko Nishimra
- Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Support std::is_aggregate on clang++ (was [cfe-dev] clang++: std::is_aggregate unusable with clang-5.0/libstdc++-7)
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Support std::is_aggregate on clang++ (was [cfe-dev] clang++: std::is_aggregate unusable with clang-5.0/libstdc++-7)
  - From: Tim Song

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]