This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017, Andrew Pinski wrote:
For the vector case, can't we write it as: _1 = BIT_FIELD_REF <high_4(D), 64, 64>; _2 = BIT_FIELD_REF <low_7(D), 64, 0>; res_8 = {_1, _2}; And then have some match.pd patterns (which might get complex), to rewrite that into VEC_PERM_EXPR?
For this last part, we have simplify_vector_constructor in tree-ssa-forwprop.c, which currently only recognizes VEC_PERM_EXPR of a single vector, but I guess it could be extended to 2 vectors. Not as good as a bswap revamp (which will be needed anyway at some point), but less work.
-- Marc Glisse
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |