This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 32/30][arm][testsuite] Fix various tests


On 14 June 2017 at 16:27, Richard Earnshaw (lists)
<Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com> wrote:
> On 13/06/17 18:29, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>> This test was overriding the options that had been detected as being
>> necessary to enable Neon.  The result was that the combination of the
>> test's options and those auto-detected were not compatible with neon
>> leading to a test failure.  The correct fix here is to stick with the
>> options that dg-add-options arm_neon has worked out.
>>
>>       * gcc.target/arm/neon-thumb2-move.c (dg-options): Don't override
>>       the architecture options added by dg-add-options arm_neon.
>>
>>
>
> The thumb2-slow-flash-data tests were relying (incorrectly) on a
> particular FPU being enabled by default.  These tests are fixed by
> adding +fp to the architecture selected.
>
>         * gcc.target/arm/neon-thumb2-move.c (dg-options): Don't override
>         the architecture options added by dg-add-options arm_neon.
>         * gcc.target/arm/thumb2-slow-flash-data-2.c (dg-opitions): Add +fp
>         to the architecture.
>         * gcc.target/arm/thumb3-slow-flash-data-3.c (dg-opitions): Likewise.
>         * gcc.target/arm/thumb4-slow-flash-data-3.c (dg-opitions): Likewise.
>         * gcc.target/arm/thumb5-slow-flash-data-3.c (dg-opitions): Likewise.
>

I confirm they now pass on my side:
http://people.linaro.org/~christophe.lyon/cross-validation/gcc-test-patches/248942-roll-up.patch2/report-build-info.html

>
> R.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]