This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: SSA range class and removal of VR_ANTI_RANGEs
- From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, David Malcolm <dmalcolm at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>, Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 20:44:00 -0600
- Subject: Re: SSA range class and removal of VR_ANTI_RANGEs
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
- Authentication-results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=law at redhat dot com
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com C23DB37E65
- Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com C23DB37E65
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20170523121117.GU8499@tucnak> <email@example.com> <20170523143436.GW8499@tucnak>
On 05/23/2017 08:34 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:29:58AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
>>> Do we really want methods starting with capital letters?
>>> I understand why you can't use union, but I don't think we use
>> FWIW in the JIT, I have a class switch_ (i.e. with a trailing
>> underscore). Maybe we should use trailing underscores for names that
>> clash with reserved words?
> union_ and not_ is just fine with me.
Likewise. No strong opinions here.