This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 0/5 v3] Vect peeling cost model

From: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: Robin Dapp <rdapp at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Bin.Cheng" <amker dot cheng at gmail dot com>, Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 09:41:30 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v3] Vect peeling cost model
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <0296a54f-cb8d-d9b8-380a-9cc553dbb6da@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <CAHFci282BedKpc99pxk1+PLHc7OxkE0bFZHRn1rsE9X+-ihuDQ@mail.gmail.com> <2804E9EF-67D1-4EFD-AF29-65C634EBE24F@gmail.com> <6f1194a0-9e57-0028-faf4-6190beec2009@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <CAFiYyc3e+UmtMGO7nEDeRT0PoTqZ2mGHz1V0C3k2WGsHGgECVg@mail.gmail.com> <3e575f6d-874a-b260-1fc2-f4db1250c32b@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <CAFiYyc0TuwUY1oqovVQF93GFPBg=qA7q4+jRFvPuhF2ayVWbHQ@mail.gmail.com> <cdd8384a-0aa6-80a9-bbea-28fdaa7379f7@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <CAFiYyc1LFtniQv9FNXJW7g8uByb8H_4vnrx52oS0kzBaKQedEw@mail.gmail.com> <15b3df5a-f6a1-23f0-57ff-1f065420df19@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <765ae66b-6294-6c39-a101-8c54a6be42ae@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <CAFiYyc0aqRzr_tbNVhhX63A88bkknzBdfjM6_rpW6rgDLB1X-g@mail.gmail.com> <279040cf-a300-ee84-d8f3-514d5405ea9a@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Robin Dapp <rdapp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> The last version of the patch series caused some regressions for ppc64.
> This was largely due to incorrect handling of unsupportable alignment
> and should be fixed with the new version.
>
> p2 and p5 have not changed but I'm posting the whole series again for
> reference.  p1 only changed comment wording, p3 was adapted to apply on
> the trunk.
>
> No regressions on s390x, x86-64 and ppc64.  Bootstrapped.

So what did actually change?  I'd rather not diff the diffs.  Can you provide
an incremental change, aka p6 that would apply to the previous series instead?

Thanks,
Richard.

> Regards
>  Robin
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/5 v3] Vect peeling cost model
  - From: Robin Dapp

References:
- Re: [RFC] S/390: Alignment peeling prolog generation
  - From: Robin Dapp
- Re: [RFC] S/390: Alignment peeling prolog generation
  - From: Richard Biener
- Re: [RFC] S/390: Alignment peeling prolog generation
  - From: Robin Dapp
- Re: [RFC] S/390: Alignment peeling prolog generation
  - From: Richard Biener
- [PATCH 4/5] Vect peeling cost model
  - From: Robin Dapp
- [PATCH 4/5 v2] Vect peeling cost model
  - From: Robin Dapp
- Re: [PATCH 4/5 v2] Vect peeling cost model
  - From: Richard Biener
- [PATCH 0/5 v3] Vect peeling cost model
  - From: Robin Dapp

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]