This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [c++ PATCH] PR c++/80682

From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at acm dot org>
To: Ville Voutilainen <ville dot voutilainen at gmail dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 12:36:20 -0400
Subject: Re: [c++ PATCH] PR c++/80682
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <CAFk2RUZMrEwC0c3CzUEscLG8XpSTS9yH69uhujkhyu34_g-ZRw@mail.gmail.com> <db20d5ca-6675-9c31-7593-5ed25941f246@acm.org> <CAFk2RUaYX_wJrKz0gR+tL3C8n4u6CGVsTdd0ss+GmmBGW7bAOA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFk2RUYU+=jjav5VfZUNPpG4seiqMK3F95cwQmo_vwNQbOea-Q@mail.gmail.com> <a9d5879a-be92-2d30-3994-e3e324b0198a@acm.org> <CAFk2RUbK-w92g3ign7peWDYR-bpoX7nxhJg8maYWwBrxzbey1g@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/10/2017 10:21 AM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:

On 10 May 2017 at 14:40, Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org> wrote:


I appreciate that, but given that I operate under Write-After Approval, I need
more than a no-objection, I will need an actual ok from a maintainer. :)

IIUC backports have to fix a regression. So you'll need to convince therelease maintainer. From a C++ POV you're approved.


nathan

--
Nathan Sidwell

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [c++ PATCH] PR c++/80682
  - From: Richard Biener

References:
- [c++ PATCH] PR c++/80682
  - From: Ville Voutilainen
- Re: [c++ PATCH] PR c++/80682
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: [c++ PATCH] PR c++/80682
  - From: Ville Voutilainen
- Re: [c++ PATCH] PR c++/80682
  - From: Ville Voutilainen
- Re: [c++ PATCH] PR c++/80682
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: [c++ PATCH] PR c++/80682
  - From: Ville Voutilainen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]