This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch, fortran] Reduce stack use in blocked matmul
On Mai 10 2017, Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:
> ... on a 32-bit system, of course.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2017-05/msg01063.html
FAIL: gfortran.dg/generic_20.f90 -O0 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/generic_20.f90 -O1 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/generic_20.f90 -O2 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/generic_20.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/generic_20.f90 -O3 -g execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/generic_20.f90 -Os execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_6.f90 -O0 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_bounds_5.f90 -O0 output pattern test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_bounds_6.f90 -O0 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_bounds_6.f90 -O1 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_bounds_6.f90 -O2 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_bounds_6.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_bounds_6.f90 -O3 -g execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_bounds_6.f90 -Os execution test
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."