This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch, fortran] Reduce stack use in blocked matmul


On Mai 10 2017, Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:

> ... on a 32-bit system, of course.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2017-05/msg01063.html

FAIL: gfortran.dg/generic_20.f90   -O0  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/generic_20.f90   -O1  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/generic_20.f90   -O2  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/generic_20.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/generic_20.f90   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/generic_20.f90   -Os  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_6.f90   -O0  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_bounds_5.f90   -O0  output pattern test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_bounds_6.f90   -O0  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_bounds_6.f90   -O1  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_bounds_6.f90   -O2  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_bounds_6.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_bounds_6.f90   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_bounds_6.f90   -Os  execution test

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]