This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ PATCH] New warning for extra semicolons after in-class function definitions

From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
To: Volker Reichelt <v dot reichelt at netcologne dot de>
Cc: David Malcolm <dmalcolm at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:32:06 -0700
Subject: Re: [C++ PATCH] New warning for extra semicolons after in-class function definitions
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <tkrat.0593279bc816987c@netcologne.de> <1491600152.9106.9.camel@redhat.com> <tkrat.315253381cf3ad63@netcologne.de>

On Apr 9, 2017, at 1:53 PM, Volker Reichelt <v.reichelt@netcologne.de> wrote:
>>> +Wextra-semi
>>> +C++ Var(warn_extra_semi) Warning
>>> +Warn about semicolon after in-class function definition.
>>> +

> Right now, the patch enables the warning only for C++.
> Would it make sense to enable it also for ObjC++?

This is reversed.  Always do the exact same thing for Objective-C++ as for C++ (unless there is a compelling reason why not).  I don't see any reason why we should avoid Objective-C++ in this case.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++ PATCH] New warning for extra semicolons after in-class function definitions
  - From: Jason Merrill

References:
- [C++ PATCH] New warning for extra semicolons after in-class function definitions
  - From: Volker Reichelt
- Re: [C++ PATCH] New warning for extra semicolons after in-class function definitions
  - From: David Malcolm
- Re: [C++ PATCH] New warning for extra semicolons after in-class function definitions
  - From: Volker Reichelt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]