This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [doc] Omit up pointer (DIR) in gcc.texi and gccint.texi?

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Joseph Myers wrote:
> I think that as far as possible we should just use "@node node-name" 
> without any of the subsequent arguments pointing to other nodes.

Thanks, Joseph.

I went ahead and applied the patch below.

Gerald

2017-03-13  Gerald Pfeifer  <gerald@pfeifer.com>
 
	* doc/gcc.texi: Remove "up" link to (DIR).
	* doc/gccint.texi: Ditto.
 
Index: doc/gcc.texi
===================================================================
--- doc/gcc.texi	(revision 246109)
+++ doc/gcc.texi	(working copy)
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
 @contents
 @page
 
-@node Top, G++ and GCC,, (DIR)
+@node Top, G++ and GCC
 @top Introduction
 @cindex introduction
 
Index: doc/gccint.texi
===================================================================
--- doc/gccint.texi	(revision 246109)
+++ doc/gccint.texi	(working copy)
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
 @contents
 @page
 
-@node Top, Contributing,, (DIR)
+@node Top, Contributing
 @top Introduction
 @cindex introduction
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]