This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: New Port for RISC-V v2
- From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at dabbelt dot com>
- To: gerald at pfeifer dot com
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: Andrew Waterman <andrew at sifive dot com>
- Cc: kito dot cheng at gmail dot com
- Cc: joseph at codesourcery dot com
- Cc: dje dot gcc at gmail dot com
- Cc: arnd at arndb dot de
- Cc: merker at debian dot org
- Cc: rth at redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 17:08:07 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: New Port for RISC-V v2
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 13:07:25 PST (-0800), gerald@pfeifer.com wrote:
> Hi Palmer,
>
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> Additionally, here's a diff against wwwdocs. This is really just to
>> check this is all I'm supposed to do, I can submit a proper patch via
>> the mailing list (I just don't know how to use CVS, sorry).
>>
>> Index: htdocs/gcc-7/changes.html
>> ===================================================================
>> +<h3 id="riscv">RISC-V</h3>
>> +<ul>
>> + <li>Support for the RISC-V instruction set has been added</li>
>> +</ul>
>
> This looks fine and is approved. (Well, modulo adding a full stop. ;-)
>
> And of course we should add this achievement to the News section of our
> home page. Something like
>
> RISC-V support
> Support for the RISC-V processor family was added, contributed
> by Palmer Dabbelt and Andrew Waterman.
>
> That is pre-approved as well.
OK, thanks. As far as I know, I don't have write access to anything yet.
Should I request it from overseers@sourceware.org? I already have binutils git
access.