This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Ok, fixed it. Can you please commit it for me, cause I don't have rights to commit? Thanks, Julia -----Original Message----- From: Uros Bizjak [mailto:ubizjak@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 12:11 PM To: Koval, Julia <julia.koval@intel.com> Cc: Andrew Senkevich <andrew.n.senkevich@gmail.com>; GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; vaalfreja@gmail.com; kirill.yukhin@gmail.com; Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable SGX intrinsics On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Koval, Julia <julia.koval@intel.com> wrote: > Ok. I fixed the enum formatting and the enums remain internal. @@ -7023,7 +7029,6 @@ ix86_can_inline_p (tree caller, tree callee) bool ret = false; tree caller_tree = DECL_FUNCTION_SPECIFIC_TARGET (caller); tree callee_tree = DECL_FUNCTION_SPECIFIC_TARGET (callee); - /* If callee has no option attributes, then it is ok to inline. */ if (!callee_tree) ret = true; No need for the above whitespace change. OK for mainline with the above part reverted. Thanks, Uros.
Attachment:
0001-Enable-SGX.PATCH
Description: 0001-Enable-SGX.PATCH
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |