This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: [PATCH] Enable SGX intrinsics


Ok, fixed it. Can you please commit it for me, cause I don't have rights to commit?

Thanks,
Julia

-----Original Message-----
From: Uros Bizjak [mailto:ubizjak@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 12:11 PM
To: Koval, Julia <julia.koval@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Senkevich <andrew.n.senkevich@gmail.com>; GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; vaalfreja@gmail.com; kirill.yukhin@gmail.com; Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable SGX intrinsics

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Koval, Julia <julia.koval@intel.com> wrote:
> Ok. I fixed the enum formatting and the enums remain internal.

@@ -7023,7 +7029,6 @@ ix86_can_inline_p (tree caller, tree callee)
   bool ret = false;
   tree caller_tree = DECL_FUNCTION_SPECIFIC_TARGET (caller);
   tree callee_tree = DECL_FUNCTION_SPECIFIC_TARGET (callee);
-
   /* If callee has no option attributes, then it is ok to inline.  */
   if (!callee_tree)
     ret = true;


No need for the above whitespace change.

OK for mainline with the above part reverted.

Thanks,
Uros.

Attachment: 0001-Enable-SGX.PATCH
Description: 0001-Enable-SGX.PATCH


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]