This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [AArch64][ARM][GCC][PATCHv2 3/3] Add tests for missing Poly64_t intrinsics to GCC

From: James Greenhalgh <james dot greenhalgh at arm dot com>
To: Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo dot tkachov at foss dot arm dot com>
Cc: Tamar Christina <Tamar dot Christina at arm dot com>, Christophe Lyon <christophe dot lyon at linaro dot org>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "christophe dot lyon at st dot com" <christophe dot lyon at st dot com>, Marcus Shawcroft <Marcus dot Shawcroft at arm dot com>, Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>, <nd at arm dot com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 13:54:59 +0000
Subject: Re: [AArch64][ARM][GCC][PATCHv2 3/3] Add tests for missing Poly64_t intrinsics to GCC
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 217.140.96.140) smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; st.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;st.com; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=arm.com;
Nodisclaimer: True
References: <VI1PR0801MB203111629E51AC006DC2D496FFA70@VI1PR0801MB2031.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <CAKdteOa4ZsykDiB+MyXRz5FmeZxWXLHUsLygouegy0+qrXk_pg@mail.gmail.com> <VI1PR0801MB2031ED9243A77319F5A5CF0BFFA60@VI1PR0801MB2031.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <VI1PR0801MB20314DA97DD94B48F7814297FFB60@VI1PR0801MB2031.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <CAKdteOYsUiMWy3bmiiP4gs2Nw08O_YAtqcD4bcrcSbXp0=6wjw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKdteOakMR7JtiZY0Rr7Ob1TtLGEyDvij-rMq04ykxsvZ2mf4g@mail.gmail.com> <VI1PR0801MB2031E928CFEB2B0053CA41E2FF890@VI1PR0801MB2031.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <VI1PR0801MB20314851CA0B552AE1AB5015FF8D0@VI1PR0801MB2031.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <583D8726.10305@foss.arm.com>
Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 01:48:22PM +0000, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> 
> On 29/11/16 09:50, Tamar Christina wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >The new patch contains the proper types for the intrinsics that should be returning uint64x1
> >and has the rest of the comments by Christophe in them.
> 
> Ok with an appropriate ChangeLog entry.

Also OK from an AArch64 persepctive based on the detailed review from
Christophe.

Thanks,
James

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AArch64][ARM][GCC][PATCHv2 3/3] Add tests for missing Poly64_t intrinsics to GCC
  - From: Christophe Lyon

References:
- [AArch64][ARM][GCC][PATCHv2 3/3] Add tests for missing Poly64_t intrinsics to GCC
  - From: Tamar Christina
- Re: [AArch64][ARM][GCC][PATCHv2 3/3] Add tests for missing Poly64_t intrinsics to GCC
  - From: Christophe Lyon
- RE: [AArch64][ARM][GCC][PATCHv2 3/3] Add tests for missing Poly64_t intrinsics to GCC
  - From: Tamar Christina
- Re: [AArch64][ARM][GCC][PATCHv2 3/3] Add tests for missing Poly64_t intrinsics to GCC
  - From: Tamar Christina
- Re: [AArch64][ARM][GCC][PATCHv2 3/3] Add tests for missing Poly64_t intrinsics to GCC
  - From: Christophe Lyon
- Re: [AArch64][ARM][GCC][PATCHv2 3/3] Add tests for missing Poly64_t intrinsics to GCC
  - From: Christophe Lyon
- RE: [AArch64][ARM][GCC][PATCHv2 3/3] Add tests for missing Poly64_t intrinsics to GCC
  - From: Tamar Christina
- Re: [AArch64][ARM][GCC][PATCHv2 3/3] Add tests for missing Poly64_t intrinsics to GCC
  - From: Tamar Christina
- Re: [AArch64][ARM][GCC][PATCHv2 3/3] Add tests for missing Poly64_t intrinsics to GCC
  - From: Kyrill Tkachov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]