Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 69495: unused-label warning does not tell which flag triggered it

[Paul Richard Thomas <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>]

Hi Janus,

Welcome back!

The patch is OK for trunk.

Best regards

Paul

PS While you are with us, are you intending to deal with the 14 PRs
for which you are the assignee or will you unassign yourself?

On 5 November 2016 at 10:15, Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here is a patch that I had submitted already in February (see
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-02/msg00011.html). Unfortunately
> it was never approved and I got distracted with other things and
> forgot about it.
>
> It's a diagnostics patch, which makes sure that the responsible flag
> is printed in several warning messages (for which this was still
> missing). As a small extra the patch also mentions the -Wpedantic flag
> in the gfortran documentation.
>
> Fortunately the patch still applies cleanly and regtests without
> failures on x86_64-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk?
>
> Cheers,
> Janus
>
>
> 2016-11-05  Janus Weil  <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
>         Manuel Lopez-Ibanez  <manu@gcc.gnu.org>
>
>     PR fortran/69495
>     * invoke.texi: Mention -Wpedantic as an alias of -pedantic.
>     * check.c (gfc_check_transfer): Mention responsible flag in warning
>     message.
>     * frontend-passes.c (do_warn_function_elimination): Ditto.
>     * resolve.c (resolve_elemental_actual): Ditto.
>     (resolve_operator): Ditto.
>     (warn_unused_fortran_label): Ditto.
>     * trans-common.c (translate_common): Ditto.
>
>
> 2016-11-05  Janus Weil  <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
>         Dominique d'Humieres  <dominiq@lps.ens.fr>
>
>     PR fortran/69495
>     * gfortran.dg/elemental_optional_args_6.f90: Use -Wpedantic flag.



-- 
The difference between genius and stupidity is; genius has its limits.

Albert Einstein