This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Put a TARGET_LRA_P into every target

From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
To: gerald at pfeifer dot com
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, law at redhat dot com, segher at kernel dot crashing dot org
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:17:37 EDT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Put a TARGET_LRA_P into every target
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <cover.1473715747.git.segher@kernel.crashing.org> <b0b52629100d9587f1cce915fdf65b5e6dc03497.1473715747.git.segher@kernel.crashing.org> <f203dcf0-53b0-40ef-2267-4282704ba37e@redhat.com> <20160914103510.GA24835@gate.crashing.org> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1609161221190.2611@anthias.pfeifer.com>

> "returns always true" -> "always returns true" ?
> 
> (The former is how we'd say it in German, and hence might be common in 
> Dutch as well?  In English, both probably are fine, the latter feeling 
> more natural to me.  But then, I'm not a native speaker. ;-)

The former is unusual in English and borders on being "wrong".  It
would be parsed as saying that it returns something called "always
true", as if that were a construct.

References:
- [PATCH 0/3] Default LRA to "on"
  - From: Segher Boessenkool
- [PATCH 1/3] Put a TARGET_LRA_P into every target
  - From: Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] Put a TARGET_LRA_P into every target
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] Put a TARGET_LRA_P into every target
  - From: Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] Put a TARGET_LRA_P into every target
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]