This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] Fix neg overflow expansion (PR middle-end/77594)


Hi!

As mentioned in the PR, during expand_arith_overflow expansion
expand_neg_overflow falls through into expand_addsub_overflow, so expands
roughly the same code twice and keeps perhaps the less efficient version
around.

Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for
trunk?

2016-09-16  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
	    Eric Botcazou  <ebotcazou@adacore.com>

	PR middle-end/77594
	* internal-fn.c (expand_arith_overflow) <case MINUS_EXPR>: Don't fall
	through into expand_addsub_overflow after expand_neg_overflow.

	* gcc.target/i386/pr77594.c: New test.

--- gcc/internal-fn.c.jj	2016-08-29 12:17:14.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/internal-fn.c	2016-09-15 09:42:09.693980531 +0200
@@ -1833,7 +1833,10 @@ expand_arith_overflow (enum tree_code co
 	    {
 	    case MINUS_EXPR:
 	      if (integer_zerop (arg0) && !unsr_p)
-		expand_neg_overflow (loc, lhs, arg1, false);
+		{
+		  expand_neg_overflow (loc, lhs, arg1, false);
+		  return;
+		}
 	      /* FALLTHRU */
 	    case PLUS_EXPR:
 	      expand_addsub_overflow (loc, code, lhs, arg0, arg1,
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr77594.c.jj	2016-09-15 09:44:51.879910346 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr77594.c	2016-09-15 09:44:43.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* PR middle-end/77594 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O0" } */
+
+int
+foo (int a, int *b)
+{
+  return __builtin_sub_overflow (0, a, b);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\tjn?o\t" 1 } } */

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]