This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Fwd: [PATCH, ARM] Use a MULTILIB_REQUIRED approach for aprofile multilib


Forwarding to gcc-patches which I forgot past patch #1
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

Currently, the Makefile fragment for ARM aprofile multilib is using a substractive approach. It specifies a set of options to be combined (eg. -march=armv7-a,armv7ve,armv8-a, with -mfpu=vfpv3-d16,neon,vfpv4-d16,neon-fpv4,neon-fp-armv8) using MULTILIB_OPTIONS and then specifies which combination should *not* be built with MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS.

This patch replaces that approach by an additive one: using MULTILIB_REQUIRED to specify the combinations we *do* want. This approach is more scalable and maintainable:

1) Scalability

The substractive approach (MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS) is doable today because there is only 3 -march and 5 -mfpu options in t-aprofile. Yet it needs already 22 MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS to define the set of multilib to be built. Adding new architecture or new mfpu would make that worse. Since we only care about a small number of combinations (each mfpu is used with only one march), it makes more sense to specify what we want. The new approach only needs 9 MULTILIB_REQUIRED lines.

2) Maintainability

Adding one new architecture or vfp option means adding exceptions for all combinations which does not make sense with that option (eg. if we add mfpu=foo we'll have to exclude all the march we don't want to mix with foo). It forces us to think about all combinations involved with this new option and thinking about the combinations in it that we do not want. Basically we have to do the work of genmultilib in our mind. MULTILIB_REQUIRED on the other hand would allow us to just specify the combination involving that new option that we care about which is likely to be more obvious IMHO.

Patch is in attachment. ChangeLog entry is as follows:


*** gcc/ChangeLog ***

2016-08-01  Thomas Preud'homme  <thomas.preudhomme@arm.com>

        * config/arm/t-aprofile (MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS): Rewrite into ...
        (MULTILIB_REQUIRED): This by specifying multilib needing to be built
        rather than those that should not be built.


The output of "tree lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/7.0.0" before and after the patch shows that the same set of multilib is being built.

Is this ok for trunk?

Best regards,

Thomas
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/t-aprofile b/gcc/config/arm/t-aprofile
index 0d91006d4ef51a765e849079fd43679175466a71..90305e1206e3964e08a673e385d3198747bdffa1 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/t-aprofile
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/t-aprofile
@@ -49,33 +49,27 @@ MULTILIB_DIRNAMES      += fpv3 simdv1 fpv4 simdvfpv4 simdv8
 MULTILIB_OPTIONS       += mfloat-abi=softfp/mfloat-abi=hard
 MULTILIB_DIRNAMES      += softfp hard
 
-# We don't build no-float libraries with an FPU.
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += *mfpu=vfpv3-d16
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += *mfpu=neon
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += *mfpu=vfpv4-d16
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += *mfpu=neon-vfpv4
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += *mfpu=neon-fp-armv8
-
-# We don't build libraries requiring an FPU at the CPU/Arch/ISA level.
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += mfloat-abi=*
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += mfpu=*
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += mthumb/mfloat-abi=*
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += mthumb/mfpu=*
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += *march=armv7-a/mfloat-abi=*
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += *march=armv7ve/mfloat-abi=*
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += *march=armv8-a/mfloat-abi=*
-
-# Ensure the correct FPU variants apply to the correct base architectures.
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += *march=armv7ve/*mfpu=vfpv3-d16*
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += *march=armv7ve/*mfpu=neon/*
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += *march=armv8-a/*mfpu=vfpv3-d16*
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += *march=armv8-a/*mfpu=neon/*
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += *march=armv7-a/*mfpu=vfpv4-d16*
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += *march=armv7-a/*mfpu=neon-vfpv4*
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += *march=armv8-a/*mfpu=vfpv4-d16*
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += *march=armv8-a/*mfpu=neon-vfpv4*
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += *march=armv7-a/*mfpu=neon-fp-armv8*
-MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS    += *march=armv7ve/*mfpu=neon-fp-armv8*
+
+# Option combinations to build library with
+
+# Default CPU/Arch (ARM is implicitly included because it uses the default
+# multilib)
+MULTILIB_REQUIRED      += mthumb
+
+# ARMv7-A
+MULTILIB_REQUIRED      += *march=armv7-a
+MULTILIB_REQUIRED      += *march=armv7-a/mfpu=vfpv3-d16/mfloat-abi=*
+MULTILIB_REQUIRED      += *march=armv7-a/mfpu=neon/mfloat-abi=*
+
+# ARMv7VE
+MULTILIB_REQUIRED      += *march=armv7ve
+MULTILIB_REQUIRED      += *march=armv7ve/mfpu=vfpv4-d16/mfloat-abi=*
+MULTILIB_REQUIRED      += *march=armv7ve/mfpu=neon-vfpv4/mfloat-abi=*
+
+# ARMv8-A
+MULTILIB_REQUIRED      += *march=armv8-a
+MULTILIB_REQUIRED      += *march=armv8-a/mfpu=neon-fp-armv8/mfloat-abi=*
+
 
 # CPU Matches
 MULTILIB_MATCHES       += march?armv7-a=mcpu?cortex-a8

--- End Message ---

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]