This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi Andrew, On 15/07/16 17:28, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:08 AM, kugan <kugan.vivekanandarajah@linaro.org> wrote:Hi Andrew,Why separate out early VRP from tree-vrp? Just a little curious.It is based on the discussion in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-01/msg00069.html. In summary, conclusion (based on my understanding) was to implement a simplified VRP algorithm that doesn't require ASSERT_EXPR insertion.But I don't see why you are moving it from tree-vrp.c . That was my question, you pointing to that discussion does not say to split it into a new file and expose these interfaces.
Are you saying that I should keep this part of tree-vrp.c. I am happy to do that if this is considered the best approach.
Thanks, Kugan
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |