This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Amend dump expectation in slsr-8.c (PR, tree-optimization/71490)


On 07/14/2016 01:21 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
>> On 07/13/2016 07:21 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> Isn't that a code quality regression?  So instead shouldn't we be keeping the same expectation, but xfailing the test?
>>>
>>> jeff
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> Disabling a pass before slsr makes the test to catch both opportunities.
>> Is the patch fine?
> 
> No, this is still a code quality regression.  What happens is that for
> some reason we fail to sink for GCC 6.

So should I just mark the test-case as a xfail?

M.

> 
> Richard.
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Martin


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]