This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Optimize fortran loops with +-1 step.
On 07/07/2016 05:53 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 02:13:12PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>> marxin wrote:
>>> gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>> 2016-07-01 Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>
>>> * lang.opt (Wundefined-do-loop): New option.
>>> * resolve.c (gfc_resolve_iterator): Warn for Wundefined-do-loop.
>>> (gfc_trans_simple_do): Generate a c-style loop.
>>> (gfc_trans_do): Fix GNU coding style.
>>
>> Can you also document the new warning in gcc/fortran/invoke.texi?
>>
>> Otherwise, this patch looks good to me. Thanks for working on it.
>
>
> If I look at the commit to .opt,
>
> +Wundefined-do-loop
> +Fortran Warning Var(warn_undefined_do_loop) LangEnabledBy(Fortran,Wall)
>
> and to .texi,
>
> +@item -Wundefined-do-loop
> [...]
> +Warn if a DO loop with step either 1 or -1 yields an underflow or an overflow
> +during iteration of an induction variable of the loop. Enabled by default.
>
> I think the "Enabled by default" is misleading as it is only enabled by -Wall,
> i.e. I had expected something like: "This warning is enabled by @option{-Wall}."
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tobias
>
Thanks for the review, I'm going to install following patch.
Martin
>From 5bfd6b5672a99952dac5aeb6c9a86a36affb0065 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marxin <mliska@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:36:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Enhance documentation of Wundefined-do-loop
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-07-08 Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>
* invoke.texi (Wundefined-do-loop): Enhance documentation.
---
gcc/fortran/invoke.texi | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/invoke.texi b/gcc/fortran/invoke.texi
index c0be1ab..87baf15 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/fortran/invoke.texi
@@ -929,7 +929,8 @@ is active for @option{-pedantic}, @option{-std=f95}, @option{-std=f2003},
@opindex @code{Wundefined-do-loop}
@cindex warnings, undefined do loop
Warn if a DO loop with step either 1 or -1 yields an underflow or an overflow
-during iteration of an induction variable of the loop. Enabled by default.
+during iteration of an induction variable of the loop.
+This option is implied by @option{-Wall}.
@item -Wunderflow
@opindex @code{Wunderflow}
--
2.8.4