This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][wwwdocs][AArch64] Mention -mcpu=qdf24xx support for GCC 6

From: Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo dot tkachov at foss dot arm dot com>
To: Evandro Menezes <e dot menezes at samsung dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: Marcus Shawcroft <marcus dot shawcroft at arm dot com>, Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>, James Greenhalgh <james dot greenhalgh at arm dot com>, Jim Wilson <jim dot wilson at linaro dot org>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 09:43:50 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH][wwwdocs][AArch64] Mention -mcpu=qdf24xx support for GCC 6
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <575048B3 dot 8020906 at foss dot arm dot com> <5751E95F dot 8030501 at samsung dot com>

Hi Evandro,

On 03/06/16 21:32, Evandro Menezes wrote:

On 06/02/16 09:54, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:

The Qualcomm QDF24xx processor is now supported via the


Shouldn't this read "The Qualcomm QDF24xx processors are now supported via the"?

Not that I have a strong opinion about it, but, otherwise, OK.


I used Jim's suggestion at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg01423.html.
I don't have a strong opinion on it either.
If Jim objects to the wording I'm happy to change it.

Kyrill

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH][wwwdocs][AArch64] Mention -mcpu=qdf24xx support for GCC 6
  - From: Jim Wilson

References:
- [PATCH][wwwdocs][AArch64] Mention -mcpu=qdf24xx support for GCC 6
  - From: Kyrill Tkachov
- Re: [PATCH][wwwdocs][AArch64] Mention -mcpu=qdf24xx support for GCC 6
  - From: Evandro Menezes

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]