This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Hi All,For the testcase in PR71408 zero_one_operation seems still broken. In handling NEGATE_EXPR, as part of undistribute_ops_list, in zero_one_operation, we are doing propagate_op_to_single_use (op, stmt, def);
This results in: - _14 = _5 * _12; _15 = (int) _11; _16 = ~_15; _17 = (unsigned int) _16; - _18 = -_5; - _19 = _17 * _18; - _20 = _14 + _19; - _24 = _5 & _20; + _19 = _5 * _17; + _35 = _19 + _12; + _34 = _35 * _5; + _20 = _34; + _24 = _20 & _5;We should instead propagate (-1) as "op" is the one which gets factored out. With the attached patch we now have:
- _14 = _5 * _12; _15 = (int) _11; _16 = ~_15; _17 = (unsigned int) _16; - _18 = -_5; - _19 = _17 * _18; - _20 = _14 + _19; - _24 = _5 & _20; + _32 = _17; + _19 = -_32; + _34 = _19 + _12; + _33 = _34 * _5; + _20 = _33; + _24 = _20 & _5;Regression tested and bootstrapped on x86-64-linux-gnu with no new regression. Is this OK for trunk?
Thanks, Kugan gcc/ChangeLog: 2016-06-05 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kuganv@linaro.org> PR middle-end/71408 * tree-ssa-reassoc.c (zero_one_operation): Fix NEGATE_EXPR operand for propagate_op_to_single_use. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2016-06-05 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kuganv@linaro.org> PR middle-end/71408 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71408.c: New test.
Attachment:
pr71408.txt
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |