This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFA 1/2]: Don't ignore target_header_dir when deciding inhibit_libc
- From: "Andre Vieira (lists)" <Andre dot SimoesDiasVieira at arm dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: uweigand at de dot ibm dot com, law at redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 18:06:06 +0100
- Subject: Re: [RFA 1/2]: Don't ignore target_header_dir when deciding inhibit_libc
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20151012095840 dot 63E773CDC at oc7340732750 dot ibm dot com> <562A1A97 dot 5080509 at redhat dot com> <56EADC62 dot 9070709 at arm dot com> <570628CF dot 4090208 at arm dot com>
On 07/04/16 10:30, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> On 17/03/16 16:33, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>> On 23/10/15 12:31, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>>> On 10/12/2015 11:58 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Index: gcc/configure.ac
>>>> ===================================================================
>>>> --- gcc/configure.ac (revision 228530)
>>>> +++ gcc/configure.ac (working copy)
>>>> @@ -1993,7 +1993,7 @@ elif test "x$TARGET_SYSTEM_ROOT" != x; t
>>>> fi
>>>>
>>>> if test x$host != x$target || test "x$TARGET_SYSTEM_ROOT" != x; then
>>>> - if test "x$with_headers" != x; then
>>>> + if test "x$with_headers" != x && test "x$with_headers" != xyes; then
>>>> target_header_dir=$with_headers
>>>> elif test "x$with_sysroot" = x; then
>>>>
>>>> target_header_dir="${test_exec_prefix}/${target_noncanonical}/sys-include"
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm missing the beginning of this conversation, but this looks like a
>>> reasonable change (avoiding target_header_dir=yes for --with-headers).
>>> So, approved.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bernd
>>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I was wondering why this never made it to trunk. I am currently running
>> into an issue that this patch would fix.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andre
>>
> Ping.
>
Ping.