This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFA 1/2]: Don't ignore target_header_dir when deciding inhibit_libc
- From: "Andre Vieira (lists)" <Andre dot SimoesDiasVieira at arm dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:33:38 +0000
- Subject: Re: [RFA 1/2]: Don't ignore target_header_dir when deciding inhibit_libc
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20151012095840 dot 63E773CDC at oc7340732750 dot ibm dot com> <562A1A97 dot 5080509 at redhat dot com>
On 23/10/15 12:31, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 11:58 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
>>
>> Index: gcc/configure.ac
>> ===================================================================
>> --- gcc/configure.ac (revision 228530)
>> +++ gcc/configure.ac (working copy)
>> @@ -1993,7 +1993,7 @@ elif test "x$TARGET_SYSTEM_ROOT" != x; t
>> fi
>>
>> if test x$host != x$target || test "x$TARGET_SYSTEM_ROOT" != x; then
>> - if test "x$with_headers" != x; then
>> + if test "x$with_headers" != x && test "x$with_headers" != xyes; then
>> target_header_dir=$with_headers
>> elif test "x$with_sysroot" = x; then
>>
>> target_header_dir="${test_exec_prefix}/${target_noncanonical}/sys-include"
>>
>
> I'm missing the beginning of this conversation, but this looks like a
> reasonable change (avoiding target_header_dir=yes for --with-headers).
> So, approved.
>
>
> Bernd
>
Hi there,
I was wondering why this never made it to trunk. I am currently running
into an issue that this patch would fix.
Cheers,
Andre