This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PING] genattrab.c generate switch


On 03/04/2016 06:56 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I think we don't need to guarantee identical assembly, the reason I've
suggested that was if it passed, it would be much easier to verify.
Without that, I think it should be bootstrapped at least on one other
target.  Note the cases you remove the parens aren't just || and &&, but
most likely also | and & (at least there is some flag whether to print those
as && or &).  And there is code for the caching of the attributes where the
result is still usable, I believe the patch doesn't break that, but it
wouldn't hurt to verify that.

Let's just defer it IMO. What do we care if other compilers are terminally broken? Let's use it as marketing material :)


Bernd


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]