This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PING] genattrab.c generate switch

From: Jesper Broge JÃrgensen <jesperbroge at gmail dot com>
To: Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt at redhat dot com>, Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 22:29:19 +0100
Subject: Re: [PING] genattrab.c generate switch
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <569CF21F dot 5020603 at gmail dot com> <569D3372 dot 9050607 at redhat dot com> <CAFiYyc0AyYESM7R-HB8WALCKz5yZKsKLBBT1zP4kf8BP83He5w at mail dot gmail dot com> <569E2248 dot 9040605 at gmail dot com> <56C5B77A dot 3050900 at redhat dot com>


On 18/02/16 13:22, Bernd Schmidt wrote:

On 01/19/2016 12:47 PM, Jesper Broge JÃrgensen wrote:
Here is the reformatted patch:
This will probably have to wait until stage1.
+      const int code = GET_CODE (op2);
+      if (code != IOR)
+    {
+      if (code == EQ_ATTR)
All the formatting still looks completely mangled. This was probablydone by your mailer. Please try attaching the diff as text/plain.
Bernd

Hi i send the patch back as an attatchment as requested about two weeksago (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01256.html) but ihave not received any response.

If it has to wait for stage 1 are there anything else i can do for thepatch untill then?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PING] genattrab.c generate switch
  - From: Patrick Palka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]