This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: AW: AW: Wonly-top-basic-asm


why not simply -Wbasic-asm ?

Since both you and Bernd favor this shorter name, I have changed it.

Indentation wrong here. The whole block must be indented by 2 spaces.

Fixed.

Comments should end with dot space space */

Fixed.

the DECL_ATTRIBUTES should be at the same column as the "naked".

Fixed.

Comments should end with dot space space */

Fixed.

the DECL_ATTRIBUTES should be at the same column as the "naked".

Fixed.

C++, isn't it always upper case?

Fixed.

ChangeLog lines begin with TAB.

Hmm. Thunderbird changed them to spaces. I've tried something different this time. Hopefully fixed.

Please split the ChangeLog
use relative file names.

Fixed (I think).

Please add the function name where you changed in brackets.

Fixed. ================================================== ChangeLog: 2016-02-11 David Wohlferd <dw@LimeGreenSocks.com> * doc/extend.texi: Doc basic asm behavior and new -Wbasic-asm option. * doc/invoke.texi: Doc new -Wbasic-asm option. ChangeLog: 2016-02-11 David Wohlferd <dw@LimeGreenSocks.com> * c.opt: Define -Wbasic-asm. ChangeLog: 2016-02-11 David Wohlferd <dw@LimeGreenSocks.com> * c-parser.c (c_parser_asm_statement): Implement -Wbasic-asm for C. ChangeLog: 2016-02-11 David Wohlferd <dw@LimeGreenSocks.com> * parser.c (cp_parser_asm_definition): Implement -Wbasic-asm for C++. ChangeLog: 2016-02-11 David Wohlferd <dw@LimeGreenSocks.com> * c-c++-common/Wbasic-asm.c: New tests for -Wbasic-asm. * c-c++-common/Wbasic-asm-2.c: Ditto. New patch is attached. Note that Bernd Schmidt and I are still discussing changes to the docs (see next message). dw

Index: gcc/c-family/c.opt
===================================================================
--- gcc/c-family/c.opt	(revision 233367)
+++ gcc/c-family/c.opt	(working copy)
@@ -585,6 +585,10 @@
 C++ ObjC++ Var(warn_namespaces) Warning
 Warn on namespace definition.
 
+Wbasic-asm
+C ObjC ObjC++ C++ Var(warn_basic_asm) Warning
+Warn on unsafe uses of basic asm.
+
 Wsized-deallocation
 C++ ObjC++ Var(warn_sized_deallocation) Warning EnabledBy(Wextra)
 Warn about missing sized deallocation functions.
Index: gcc/c/c-parser.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/c/c-parser.c	(revision 233367)
+++ gcc/c/c-parser.c	(working copy)
@@ -5978,8 +5978,19 @@
   labels = NULL_TREE;
 
   if (c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_CLOSE_PAREN) && !is_goto)
-    goto done_asm;
+    {
+      /* Warn on basic asm used inside of functions,
+	 except when in naked functions.  Also allow asm ("").  */
+      if (warn_basic_asm && TREE_STRING_LENGTH (str) != 1)
+	if (lookup_attribute ("naked",
+			      DECL_ATTRIBUTES (current_function_decl))
+	    == NULL_TREE)
+	  warning_at (asm_loc, OPT_Wbasic_asm,
+		      "asm statement in function does not use extended syntax");
 
+      goto done_asm;
+    }
+
   /* Parse each colon-delimited section of operands.  */
   nsections = 3 + is_goto;
   for (section = 0; section < nsections; ++section)
Index: gcc/cp/parser.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/cp/parser.c	(revision 233367)
+++ gcc/cp/parser.c	(working copy)
@@ -18041,6 +18041,8 @@
   bool goto_p = false;
   required_token missing = RT_NONE;
 
+  location_t asm_loc = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer)->location;
+
   /* Look for the `asm' keyword.  */
   cp_parser_require_keyword (parser, RID_ASM, RT_ASM);
 
@@ -18199,6 +18201,17 @@
 	  /* If the extended syntax was not used, mark the ASM_EXPR.  */
 	  if (!extended_p)
 	    {
+	      /* Warn on basic asm used inside of functions,
+		 EXCEPT when in naked functions.  Also allow asm ("").  */
+	      if (warn_basic_asm
+		  && TREE_STRING_LENGTH (string) != 1)
+		if (lookup_attribute ("naked",
+				      DECL_ATTRIBUTES (current_function_decl))
+		    == NULL_TREE)
+		  warning_at (asm_loc, OPT_Wbasic_asm,
+			      "asm statement in function does not use extended"
+			      " syntax");
+
 	      tree temp = asm_stmt;
 	      if (TREE_CODE (temp) == CLEANUP_POINT_EXPR)
 		temp = TREE_OPERAND (temp, 0);
Index: gcc/doc/extend.texi
===================================================================
--- gcc/doc/extend.texi	(revision 233367)
+++ gcc/doc/extend.texi	(working copy)
@@ -7458,7 +7458,8 @@
 @end table
 
 @subsubheading Remarks
-Using extended @code{asm} typically produces smaller, safer, and more
+Using extended @code{asm} (@pxref{Extended Asm}) typically produces smaller,
+safer, and more
 efficient code, and in most cases it is a better solution than basic
 @code{asm}.  However, there are two situations where only basic @code{asm}
 can be used:
@@ -7516,11 +7517,51 @@
 Basic @code{asm} provides no
 mechanism to provide different assembler strings for different dialects.
 
-Here is an example of basic @code{asm} for i386:
+Basic @code{asm} statements do not perform an implicit "memory" clobber
+(@pxref{Clobbers}).  Also, there is no implicit clobbering of @emph{any}
+registers, so (other than in @code{naked} functions which follow the ABI
+rules) changed registers must be restored to their original value before
+exiting the @code{asm}.  While this behavior has not always been
+documented, GCC has worked this way since at least v2.95.3.
 
+@strong{Warning:} This "clobber nothing" behavior may be different than how
+other compilers treat basic @code{asm}, since the C standards for the
+@code{asm} statement provide no guidance regarding these semantics.  As a
+result, @code{asm} statements that work correctly on other compilers may not
+work correctly with GCC (and vice versa), even though they both compile
+without error.
+
+Future versions of GCC may change basic @code{asm} to clobber memory and
+perhaps some (or all) registers.  This change may fix subtle problems with
+existing @code{asm} statements.  However it may break or slow down ones
+that were working correctly.  To ``future-proof'' your asm against possible
+changes to basic @code{asm}'s semantics, use extended @code{asm}.
+
+You can use @option{-Wbasic-asm} to locate basic @code{asm}
+statements that may need changes, and refer to
+@uref{https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/ConvertBasicAsmToExtended, How to convert
+from basic asm to extended asm} for information about how to perform the
+conversion.
+
+Here is an example of top-level basic @code{asm} for i386 that defines an
+asm macro.  That macro is then invoked from within a function using
+extended @code{asm}:
+
 @example
-/* Note that this code will not compile with -masm=intel */
-#define DebugBreak() asm("int $3")
+/* Define macro at file scope with basic asm.  */
+/* Add macro parameter p to eax.  */
+asm (".macro test p\n\t"
+    "addl $\\p, %eax\n\t"
+    ".endm");
+
+/* Use macro in function using extended asm.  It needs
+   the "cc" clobber since the flags are changed and uses
+   the "a" constraint since it modifies eax.  */
+int DoAdd (int value)
+@{
+   asm ("test 5" : "+a" (value) : : "cc");
+   return value;
+@}
 @end example
 
 @node Extended Asm
Index: gcc/doc/invoke.texi
===================================================================
--- gcc/doc/invoke.texi	(revision 233367)
+++ gcc/doc/invoke.texi	(working copy)
@@ -5727,6 +5727,21 @@
 a structure that has been marked with the @code{designated_init}
 attribute.
 
+@item -Wbasic-asm @r{(C and C++ only)}
+Warn if basic @code{asm} statements are used inside a function (i.e. not at
+top-level/file scope).
+
+When used inside of functions, basic @code{asm} can result in unexpected and
+unwanted variations in behavior between compilers due to how registers are
+handled when calling the asm (@pxref{Basic Asm}).  The lack of input and
+output constraints (@pxref{Extended Asm}) can also make it difficult for
+optimizers to correctly and consistently position the output relative to
+other code.
+
+Functions that are marked with the @option{naked} attribute (@pxref{Function
+Attributes}) and @code{asm} statements with an empty instruction string are
+excluded from this check.
+
 @item -Whsa
 Issue a warning when HSAIL cannot be emitted for the compiled function or
 OpenMP construct.
Index: gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wbasic-asm-2.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wbasic-asm-2.c	(revision 0)
+++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wbasic-asm-2.c	(working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target naked_functions } */
+/* { dg-options "-Wbasic-asm" } */
+
+int __attribute__((naked))
+func (int x, int y)
+{
+  /* Basic asm should not warn in naked functions.  */
+   asm (" "); /* No warning.  */
+}
+
+int main (int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+   return func (argc, argc);
+}
Index: gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wbasic-asm.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wbasic-asm.c	(revision 0)
+++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wbasic-asm.c	(working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Wbasic-asm" } */
+
+#if defined (__i386__) || defined (__x86_64__)
+/* Acceptable.  */
+register int b asm ("esi");
+#else
+int b = 3;
+#endif
+
+/* Acceptable.  */
+int foo asm ("myfoo") = 2;
+
+/* Acceptable.  */
+asm (" ");
+
+/* Acceptable.  */
+int func (int x, int y) asm ("MYFUNC");
+
+int main (int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+#if defined (__i386__) || defined (__x86_64__)
+   /* Acceptable.  */
+   register int a asm ("edi");
+#else
+   int a = 2;
+#endif
+
+   /* Acceptable.  */
+   asm (" "::"r"(a), "r" (b));
+
+   /* Acceptable.  */
+   asm goto (""::::done);
+
+   /* Acceptable.  */
+   asm ("");
+
+   /* Acceptable.  */
+   asm (" "); /* { dg-warning "does not use extended syntax" } */
+
+  done:
+   return 0;
+}

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]