This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, PR target/69454] Disable TARGET_STV when stack is not properly aligned


On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Ilya Enkovich <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 27 Jan 16:44, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 06:34:41PM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> > @@ -5453,6 +5443,11 @@ ix86_option_override_internal (bool main_args_p,
>> >      opts->x_target_flags |= MASK_VZEROUPPER;
>> >    if (!(opts_set->x_target_flags & MASK_STV))
>> >      opts->x_target_flags |= MASK_STV;
>> > +  /* Disable STV if -mpreferred-stack-boundary={2,3} - the needed
>>
>> The comment doesn't match the code, you disable STV only for
>> -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2.
>
> Thanks, here is an updated version.
>
> Ilya
> --
> gcc/
>
> 2016-01-27  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
>             Ilya Enkovich  <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com>
>
>         PR target/69454
>         * config/i386/i386.c (convert_scalars_to_vector): Remove
>         stack alignment fixes.
>         (ix86_option_override_internal): Disable TARGET_STV if stack
>         is not properly aligned.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>
> 2016-01-27  Ilya Enkovich  <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com>
>
>         PR target/69454
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr69454-1.c: New test.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr69454-2.c: New test.
>
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> index 34b57a4..9fb8db8 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> @@ -3588,16 +3588,6 @@ convert_scalars_to_vector ()
>    bitmap_obstack_release (NULL);
>    df_process_deferred_rescans ();
>
> -  /* Conversion means we may have 128bit register spills/fills
> -     which require aligned stack.  */
> -  if (converted_insns)
> -    {
> -      if (crtl->stack_alignment_needed < 128)
> -       crtl->stack_alignment_needed = 128;
> -      if (crtl->stack_alignment_estimated < 128)
> -       crtl->stack_alignment_estimated = 128;
> -    }
> -
>    return 0;
>  }
>
> @@ -5453,6 +5443,11 @@ ix86_option_override_internal (bool main_args_p,
>      opts->x_target_flags |= MASK_VZEROUPPER;
>    if (!(opts_set->x_target_flags & MASK_STV))
>      opts->x_target_flags |= MASK_STV;
> +  /* Disable STV if -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 - the needed
> +     stack realignment will be extra cost the pass doesn't take into
> +     account and the pass can't realign the stack.  */
> +  if (ix86_preferred_stack_boundary < 64)
> +    opts->x_target_flags &= ~MASK_STV;
>    if (!ix86_tune_features[X86_TUNE_AVX256_UNALIGNED_LOAD_OPTIMAL]
>        && !(opts_set->x_target_flags & MASK_AVX256_SPLIT_UNALIGNED_LOAD))
>      opts->x_target_flags |= MASK_AVX256_SPLIT_UNALIGNED_LOAD;

MINIMUM_ALIGNMENT keeps track stack alignment.  It is OK
to disable STV for -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2.  But you should
also update ix86_minimum_alignment to make sure that STV is
disabled before returning 32 for DImode.


-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]