This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH 0/2] obsolete some old targets
- From: Trevor Saunders <tbsaunde at tbsaunde dot org>
- To: Kamil Rytarowski <n54 at gmx dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:10:09 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] obsolete some old targets
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1450151726-16267-1-git-send-email-tbsaunde+gcc at tbsaunde dot org> <56729E8B dot 2010607 at gmx dot com> <20151217142252 dot GA30321 at tsaunders-iceball dot corp dot tor1 dot mozilla dot com> <trinity-84457247-cfb3-433c-b181-b239cf5ce27e-1450362978494 at 3capp-mailcom-bs08>
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 03:36:18PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I talked with devs and it will be better to just keep it removed and focus on native NetBSD with NetBSD userland.
>
> Actually nobody seems to be interested in the Debian/NetBSD distribution.
that's what I thought from googling, so I'll just go ahead and commit
these patches.
Trev
>
> Thanks,
>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 3:24 PM
> > From: "Trevor Saunders" <tbsaunde@tbsaunde.org>
> > To: "Kamil Rytarowski" <n54@gmx.com>
> > Cc: tbsaunde+gcc@tbsaunde.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] obsolete some old targets
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:37:47PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA256
> > >
> > > I want to keep knetbsd alive. My application for FSF is still ongoing.
> > >
> > > Please hold on.
> >
> > Well, These patches aren't going to make resurrecting knetbsd
> > significantly harder, there isn't even a significant amount of knetbsd
> > specific code in gcc, so even removing it should be easily reverted
> > should that become desirable. On the other hand it doesn't seem like
> > removing the knetbsd specific code will help much at the moment either.
> > So I guess it doesn't really matter one way or another to me.
> >
> > Trev
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > On 15.12.2015 04:55, tbsaunde+gcc@tbsaunde.org wrote:
> > > > From: Trevor Saunders <tbsaunde+gcc@tbsaunde.org>
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg00365.html reminded me
> > > > I hadn't gotten around to marking *-knetbsd and openbsd 2/3
> > > > obsolete as I offered to do back in the spring.
> > > >
> > > > I tested I could still build on x86_64-linux-gnu, and could only
> > > > cross compile to i386-openbsd2 i386-openbsd3 and
> > > > x86_64_64-knetbsd-gnu with --enable-obsolete. Given how late in
> > > > the cycle we are I'm not sure if we should remove these targets as
> > > > soon as stage 1 opens, but we might as well obsolete them I guess,
> > > > ok to commit?
> > > >
> > > > Trev
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Trevor Saunders (2): mark *-knetbsd-* as obsolete obsolete openbsd
> > > > 2.0 and 3.X
> > > >
> > > > gcc/config.gcc | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1
> > > > deletion(-)
> > > >
> > >
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > Version: GnuPG v2
> > >
> > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWcp6JAAoJEEuzCOmwLnZs6IEQAKzugPu0CurmIRNyLR6oyTd3
> > > sTTt/ffzD3RibyJEIVjTBC5tfOFcnS2Mi57TRdN5lDfyF1gwsPpvcY5Ce+WTjnHf
> > > 4Npi/SDego2HPQka5laeJv/MJdBrc7f5bncowcicrZMvo1QImYA4BFQuRk3rMSWj
> > > y31GUlTlP7yQFQ0FSXGFegkEZ7J/LqYmW+piSMhqEcqnRD6FJgGNwGPIngdQ3HvE
> > > w4z37n1Bs8qD9P6AW0D3YZfvDKn7GbGGTVq3uk1MI78hivXdCgXPyY3qnhVCmTjj
> > > 2dAX2h0Tl5aYBbVseO2ecPm/U7BnOYQBACnysnNjh3TLBzIjoXrt1Sao1m2aywj/
> > > f1+LUS2ySknZKidJRNGO/IqrhDIG2Qgmrn2MQDofTCFIwcrvZkt2wRqjBhf7IaCc
> > > Y5o7/emwj+dbfbPQNvu7RS6kFtOS4JXgs8b8D3oXHc9D9BNWYWEu5XSIWK+1HwwF
> > > 3wMcqZoZdqDFm1swM1XjOFpMjengq4AY8HAEROnj1p1qG4LhFKD84qFnELpEDowa
> > > leG9B+l9yoJQVi2GgZA8XmE7gT54oHu+pqlL7N/FgMNRS1rg4YUmAF6DOWl9cWm+
> > > NAdugbI+6VDUcvhgtrPIUv378Zn2jSUwzdl+hFp9C+jrwsc0KQN8Sg3a1wX3e8yf
> > > 0nsnHzcG0ulJnBPTDdEN
> > > =RMIO
> > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >