This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [gomp4.5] depend nowait support for target
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Ilya Verbin <iverbin at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Kirill Yukhin <kirill dot yukhin at gmail dot com>, Thomas Schwinge <thomas at codesourcery dot com>, Alexander Monakov <amonakov at ispras dot ru>, Martin Jambor <mjambor at suse dot cz>
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:41:53 +0100
- Subject: Re: [gomp4.5] depend nowait support for target
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20150908092014 dot GA1847 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <20151002192801 dot GA24765 at msticlxl57 dot ims dot intel dot com> <20151015140156 dot GE478 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <20151019194754 dot GB1855 at msticlxl57 dot ims dot intel dot com> <20151111165222 dot GL5675 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <20151112174509 dot GG5675 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <20151112205133 dot GC4917 at msticlxl57 dot ims dot intel dot com> <20151113101841 dot GL5675 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <20151113151150 dot GQ5675 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <20151113163717 dot GA28000 at msticlxl57 dot ims dot intel dot com>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 07:37:17PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> I don't know which interface to implement to maintain compatibility in the
> future.
> Anyway, currently it's impossible that a process will use the same liboffloadmic
> for 2 different offloading paths (say GCC's in exec and ICC's in a dso), because
> in fact GCC's and ICC's libraries are not the same. First of all, they have
> different names: liboffloadmic in GCC and just liboffload in ICC. And most
> importantly, ICC's version contains some references to libiomp5, which were
> removed form GCC's version. In theory, we want to use one library with all
> compilers, but I'm not sure when it will be possible.
Ok, in that case it is less of a problem.
> > Do you get still crashes on any of the testcases with this?
>
> No, all tests now pass using emul. I'll report when I have any results on HW.
Perfect, I'll commit it to gomp-4_5-branch then.
Thanks.
Jakub