This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] i386: Use the STC bb-reorder algorithm at -Os (PR67864)


Adding x86 maintainer, ping?

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 05:53:41AM -0700, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> For x86, STC still gives better results for optimise-for-size than
> "simple" does.  So use STC at -Os as well.
> 
> Is this okay for trunk?
> 
> 
> Segher
> 
> 
> 2015-10-16  Segher Boessenkool  <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
> 
> 	PR rtl-optimization/67864
> 	* common/config/i386/i386-common.c (ix86_option_optimization_table)
> 	<OPT_freorder_blocks_algorithm_>: Use REORDER_BLOCKS_ALGORITHM_STC
> 	at -Os and up.
> 
> ---
>  gcc/common/config/i386/i386-common.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/common/config/i386/i386-common.c b/gcc/common/config/i386/i386-common.c
> index 79b2472..bb9f29c 100644
> --- a/gcc/common/config/i386/i386-common.c
> +++ b/gcc/common/config/i386/i386-common.c
> @@ -1011,6 +1011,9 @@ static const struct default_options ix86_option_optimization_table[] =
>      { OPT_LEVELS_2_PLUS, OPT_free, NULL, 1 },
>      /* Enable function splitting at -O2 and higher.  */
>      { OPT_LEVELS_2_PLUS, OPT_freorder_blocks_and_partition, NULL, 1 },
> +    /* The STC algorithm produces the smallest code at -Os, for x86.  */
> +    { OPT_LEVELS_2_PLUS, OPT_freorder_blocks_algorithm_, NULL,
> +      REORDER_BLOCKS_ALGORITHM_STC },
>      /* Turn off -fschedule-insns by default.  It tends to make the
>         problem with not enough registers even worse.  */
>      { OPT_LEVELS_ALL, OPT_fschedule_insns, NULL, 0 },
> -- 
> 2.4.3


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]