This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 11/03/2015 02:57 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
It looks like that was changed explicitly in 2014 (see the history of g++.dg/abi/offsetof.C). I'm not a C++ expert, but it appears this kind of use is considered OK these days.On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:57:22AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:On 11/02/2015 06:26 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:The attached patch fixes the annoying warnings generated by diagnostic_set_last_function.Can you point out what warning you're fixing?Sure. toplec.c calls diagnostic_set_last_function with a NULL pointer as the second argument, and cp/typeck.c complains about it. Ah, it seems the *current* version of Gcc does not generate the warning, but the old one (4.8.5) I used to compile does. So, it may or may not be worth to apply the patch.
jeff
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |